Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2384/2026 of HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHEGOWDA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 27 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23459 CRL.P No. 2384 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2384 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHEGOWDA S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2384 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC)
/ 483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHEGOWDA
S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT NUGGAHALLI,
KOPPALU VILLAGE,
BANNUR HOBLI,
T. NARASIPURA TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIJAY B.K..,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION,
Digitally
signed by
PAVITHRA
N
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
BENGALURU- 560 083
REPRESENTED BY THE SPP.
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU- 560 001
…RESPONDENT
(BY Smt.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC
(FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT BAIL TO THE
PETITIONER
BY
DIRECTING
THE
RESPONDENT
TO
ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH CRIME NO.285/2023 REGISTERED BY BANNURU
POLICE STATION, MYSURU DISTRICT, FOR THE ALLEGED
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
INDIAN PENAL CODE, PENDING IN S.C. NO.303/2023 ON
THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the Trial Court has passed a judgment of conviction against the petitioner. Hence, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Considering the same, leave is granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6