Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/5427/2026 of SRI SACHINDRANATH TIWARI @ DILIP KUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 27 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:23507 CRL.P No. 5427 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5427 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI SACHINDRANATH TIWARI @ DILIP KUMAR AGE ABOUT 56

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:23507

CRL.P No. 5427 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5427 OF 2026

(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS))

BETWEEN:

SRI SACHINDRANATH TIWARI

@ DILIP KUMAR

AGE ABOUT 56 YEARS,

S/O SHAMBUNATH TIWARI,

R/AT NO 13, 1ST FLOOR,

1ST C CROSS, SUDHAMANAGARA,

BENGALURU - 560 027.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. HARINATH M.S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

V V PURAM POLICE STATION,

BENGALURU CITY,

REP BY ITS SPP,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

BENGALURU CITY - 560 001.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SMT. ANITHA GIRISH N., HCGP)

Digitally

signed by

PAVITHRA

N

Location:

High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:23507

CRL.P No. 5427 of 2026

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) BY

THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO GRANT

REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN WHO HAS BEEN

ARRAYED AS THE SOLE ACCUSED NO.1 IN CR.NO.4/2026 OF

THE RESPONDENT IN V.V.PURAM P.S., FOR THE OFFENCE

P/U/S 69, 351(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS, PENDING BEFORE THE

HON’BLE XXXVII ACJM, AT BENGALURU.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty, as sought for.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 104

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead