Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5721/2026 of MR. PARAG MODI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 27 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23508 CRL.P No. 5721 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5721 OF 2026 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR. PARAG MODI S/O. SRI. RADHEYSHYAM MODI, AGED ABOUT 51
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:23508
CRL.P No. 5721 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5721 OF 2026
(438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
MR. PARAG MODI
S/O. SRI. RADHEYSHYAM MODI,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
DIRECTOR OF BUREAU ID INDIA PVT. LTD.
HAVING ADDRESS AT 10TH FLOOR,
SAFAL HEIGHTS MOTZBAUG NEXT TO,
RATNA MARKET CHENDUR,
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA – 400 071.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARENDRA DEV H N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HULIMAVU POLICE STATION
BENGALURU - 560 076.
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU – 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY., HCGP)
Digitally
signed by
PAVITHRA
N
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:23508
CRL.P No. 5721 of 2026
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.438 (FILED U/S.482 BNSS)
CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT
POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT
OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO.378/2025 REGISTERED BY THE
HULIMAVU POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 66(C) AND 66(D) OF THE IT ACT 2000, AND SEC.318(4), 319(2) R/W SEC.3(5) OF BNS 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh application.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty, as sought for.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 105