Karnataka High Court
WP/38847/2025 of SRI KRISHNAMURTHY P Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23012 WP No. 38847 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 38847 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI KRISHNAMURTHY P S/O LATE PATALAPPA AGED 53 YEARS NO.196, KUMBARARA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 38847 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
SRI KRISHNAMURTHY P
S/O LATE PATALAPPA
AGED 53 YEARS
NO.196, KUMBARARA BEEDI
OPP. GOVT.SCHOOL, MARASANDRSA,
BENGALURU RURAL TALUK-5612032
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MADHUSUDHAN M.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGLORE URBAN DISTRICT
KANDAYA BHAVAN
K.G ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 009.
3.
THE ASSISTANT DEPUTY DIRECTOR
OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEY
Digitally signed
by YASHODA K L
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
YALAHANKA TALUK
MINI VIDHANASOUDHA, 1ST FLOOR,
YALAHANKA BANGALORE - 560 064.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
MINI VIDHANASOUDHA,
YALAHANKA BANGALORE - 560 064.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE FOURTH
RESPONDENT TO TAKE APPROPRIATE LEGAL STEPS TO AFFECT
THE PHODI FORTHWITH IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER LAND
TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ABOVE
CASE/DIRECT THE FOURTH RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATION DATED 15.10.2025 AS PER ANNX-E GIVEN
BY THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.
HC-KAR
2. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondent-Tahasildar, Bengaluru North Taluk, to consider the representation given by the petitioner for phodi and dhurast of land bearing Sy.No.41/P12 measuring 1 acre situated at Kedathanamali Village, Hesaraghatta Hobli, Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate however submits that an application for Phodi and Durast work is required to be made online and therefore, the petitioner may be directed to file an application online.
4. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Government Advocate, this writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file an application online to the respondent-Tahasildar and the respondent-Tahasildar is also directed to consider the application which would be filed by the petitioner and do the needful as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within
HC-KAR
a period of two months from the date of receipt of the application.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT/- CT: JL