Karnataka High Court
WP/30377/2025 of SMT PAVITHRA V Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:22986 WP No. 30377 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 30377 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT PAVITHRA V W/O SRI RAGHAVENDRA.C D/O LATE VIRUPAKSHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 30377 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT PAVITHRA V
W/O SRI RAGHAVENDRA.C
D/O LATE VIRUPAKSHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT NO.157, RAMANNA STREET,
BASAVANAPURA, BANNERUGHATTA ROAD,
VTC, BENGALURU SOUTH, P.O- GOTTIGERE,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
BENGALURU-560 083.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H MAREGOWDA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY,
M.S. BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
SOUTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 002.
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE TAHASILDAR,
ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS IN CASE NO. RA/ANE-148/2025 FROM THE 2ND
RESPONDENT-APPELLATE
AUTHORITY
AND
QUASH
THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.05.2025 IN CASE NO. RA/ANE- 148/2025 BY 2ND RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF LAND
BEARING SURVEY NO. 108, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 15- 00 ACRES, SITUATED AT NERIGA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBIL, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, AT ANNEXURE- A AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that the order impugned at Annexure-A is passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru South Sub-Division, Bengaluru Urban District under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act,
HC-KAR
1964, and an alternative and efficacious remedy is available for the petitioner under Section 136(3) of the Act before the Deputy Commissioner.
3. Upholding the submission of the learned Additional Government Advocate, writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner.
4. Office to return the original documents/certified copies to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL CT: JL