Karnataka High Court
WP/20496/2025 of SMT. B. S. MANJULA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 25 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:22977 WP No. 20496 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 20496 OF 2025 (KLR-CON) BETWEEN: SMT. B. S. MANJULA WIFE OF S. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 20496 OF 2025 (KLR-CON)
BETWEEN:
SMT. B. S. MANJULA
WIFE OF S. RAMAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT KUBARABIDI,
HESARAGHATTA,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 088.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. YETURI MURALI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. ANIL KUMAR H S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE DISTRICT,
BANGALORE - 560 009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA
PRAYING
TO
QUASHING
THE
ENDORSEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 6/5/2024 PASSED ON THE APPLICATION NO. 678202 DATED 6-05-2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER ON THE FILE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DISTRICT AT BANGALORE (ANNEXURE-E) ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for both the respondents.
2. Learned High Court Government Pleader raises a preliminary objection that the order impugned is passed by the Deputy Commissioner, rejecting the application for conversion and therefore the order is an original order passed by the Deputy Commissioner which is appealable before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in terms of Section 49(c).
3. Upholding the submissions of the learned High Court Government Pleader, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
HC-KAR
4. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61