Karnataka High Court
WP/12911/2026 of SRI D R MUNEGOWDA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 24 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:22503 WP No. 12911 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 12911 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. D.R. MUNEGOWDA S/O M. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 12911 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. D.R. MUNEGOWDA
S/O M. RAJANNA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DODDAKOILGA VILLAGE,
SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 122.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MARTHESHA G.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S.OFFICE BUILDINGS,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE TAHASILDAR,
HOSAKOTE TALUK,
HOSAKOTE - 562 114.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
DODDABALLAPURA, SUB-DIVISION,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203.
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
4.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX,
BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.
5.
THE REGULARIZATION COMMITTEE,
HOSAKOTE TALUK, HOSAKOTE,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26.11.98, DTD
19.12.18, DTD 17.03.17 VIDE ANNEXURE A, B AND C TO
REGULARIZE THE UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF LAND BY
THE PETITIONER.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents.
HC-KAR
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that he filed an application in Form No.53 and acknowledgement of the same was issued on 26.11.1998, seeking regularisation of unauthorised occupation of 2 acres of land in Survey No.59 of Chikkakoliga Village, Sulibele Hobli, Hosakote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, but the same is not considered till date. Therefore, the prayer in the petition is to direct the respondents to consider the application filed in Form No.53 by the petitioner in the year 1998.
3. Having regard to the contentions raised in the writ petition and submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that respondent No.2-Tahsildar was duty bound to place the application filed by the petitioner before respondent No.5- Committee and the Committee was also duty bound to consider the application and pass necessary orders.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to respondent No.2-Tahsildar, Hosakote Taluk, to verify from the records as to whether an application filed by the petitioner seeking regularisation of unauthorized occupation of
HC-KAR
land is pending consideration. If it is found that an application was indeed filed by the petitioner and the application is yet to be considered, the Tahsildar is directed to place before the Committee for regularisation of unauthorised occupation, the application along with his recommendation within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall consider the application and pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Ordered accordingly.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19