Karnataka High Court

WP/10664/2026 of SMT PAVITHRA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:22345 WP No. 10664 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10664 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PAVITHRA, W/O SRI. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 10664 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. PAVITHRA,

W/O SRI. NARAYANASWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE,

HAROHALLI HOBLI,

KANAKAPURA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 112.

2.

SMT. SUSHMA,

W/O SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

NO.43/1, 2ND MAIN,

2ND CROSS, SAKAMMA GARDEN,

BASAVANAGUDI,

BANGALORE - 560 004.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SRINIVAS.A.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

M.S.BUILDING,

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

Digitally signed

by YASHODA K L

Location: High

Court Of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,

DISTRICT COMMISSIONERATE OFFICE,

B.M.ROAD, OPPOSITE TO

GHOUSIA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,

VIJAYA NAGARA,

RAMANAGARA - 562 159.

3.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION,

DISTRICT COMMISSIONERATE OFFICE,

B.M.ROAD, OPPOSITE TO GHOUSIA

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,

VIJAYA NAGAR,

RAMANAGARA - 562 159.

4.

THE TAHSILDAR,

HAROHALLI HOBLI,

KANAKAPURA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 112.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R4

TO EFFECT MUTATION ENTRIES BY INCORPORATING THE

NAMES OF THE PETITIONER AND COMPLETE PHODI AND

DURASTI WORK AS PER REPRESENTATION DATED 20.03.2026

VIDE AS PER ANNEXURE - A WITH IN RESPECT OF LAND

MEASURING 23 GUNATS IN THE LAND BEARING EARLIER

SURVEY NO.13 NOW RE-NUMBERED AS SURVEY NO.13/3

ALONG WITH 7 GUNATS IN SY. NO.6/1, 2 GUANTS IN SY. NO.

47/13 AND 1 GUNATS IN SY. NO.6/2 ALL SITUATED AT

HC-KAR

ATTIGUPPE

VILLAGE,

MARALAVADI

HOBLI,

KANAKAPURA

TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned HCGP takes notice for all the respondents.

2. It is the contention of the petitioners that in terms of the judgment and decree passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kanakapura in OS No.377 of 2015, the petitioners have been allotted properties to the extent of 23 guntas in Sy.No.13 (new Sy.No.13/3), 7 guntas in Sy.No.6/1, 2 guntas in Sy.No.47/13 and 1 gunta in Sy.No.6/2, all situated at Attiguppe Village, Maralavadi Hobli, Kanakpura Taluk, Ramanagara District. The petitioners have given a representation to the fourth respondent-Tahsildar, Kanakapura Taluk, to enter their names in the revenue records in terms of the decree passed by the competent Civil Court. However, the Tahsidar has not considered the representation, till date.

HC-KAR

3. Having regard to the facts narrated hereinabove, this Court is of the considered opinion that the respondent Tahsildar, Kanakpura Taluk is duty bound to consider the representation given by the petitioner, to issue notice to all concerned and thereafter proceed to enter the names of the petitioners in the revenue records in terms of the judgment and decree passed by the competent Civil Court and proceed to pass orders in accordance with law and dispose of the representation as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. Learned HCGP is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead