Karnataka High Court
WP/1461/2024 of SHRI M MUNIRAJU Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2024 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. M. MUNIRAJU, S/O MUNI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2024 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI. M. MUNIRAJU,
S/O MUNI CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
2.
SHRI. RAVI,
S/O KONERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
3.
SHRI. MANJUNATH,
S/O. KONERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
4.
SHRI. GOWRISHA,
S/O. KONERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
5.
SHRI. GOWDARAJA,
S/O. MUNISWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
6.
SHRI. NARAYANASWAMY,
S/O. KAMALAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
7.
SHRI. KANTHAKUMAR,
S/O LATE T. THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
8.
SMT. NEELAMMA,
W/O. CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
9.
C. MANJUNATH,
S/O. CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
10.
DODDAKALLAPPA,
S/O. DANDU CHIKKA CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
11.
KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/O. DODDA KALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
12.
CHIKKANNA,
S/O. DODDA KALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
13.
SHRI. HARISH,
S/O. CHIKKA KALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
14.
SHRI. A.G. SRINVIAS MURTHY,
S/O. DANDHU CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
15.
SHRI. NAVEENKUMAR,
S/O. A.G. SRINIVASA MURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
HC-KAR
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
DASARAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
NOW BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
BANGALORE DISTRICT.
ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY
SHRI. M. SRINVIAS,
S/O SHRI M RAMARAJ,
THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
OF LAND OWNERS OF LAND BEARING
SY NO.65/3, SITUATED AT
DASARAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER,
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
HC-KAR
4.
THE COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
EX-OFFICIO CONVENER OF COMMITTEE
HEADED BY THE HON'BLE JUSTICE (RETD.)
K.N. KESHAVANARAYANA AND OTHERS.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.G.S. ARUNA, HCGP FOR R1
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER
WRIT TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED REPORT DATED:18.01.2023
IN No.KNKC No-93/2022 (DASARAHALLI) AS PER ANNEXURE-D
AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT No.2 AND 4 TO PLACE THE
GRIEVANCES OF THE LAND OWNERS/ PETITIONERS AS PER
ANNEXURE-C AND C1 BEFORE THE COMMITTEE FOR FRESH
CONSIDERATION WITH A DIRECTION TO FOLLOW THE
GUIDELINES FORMULATED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT IN WA NO.2624/2005 (BDA Vs STATE OF
KARNATAKA AND OTHERS REPORTED IN ILR 2006 KAR PAGE
No.318 AS WELL AS THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE HON'BLE
APEX
COURT
PASSED
IN
BONDU
RAMASWAMY
CASE
REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the petitioner was not present in the first round when the matter was called. He is not present in the second round when the matter is taken up at 4:20 pm. Therefore, we have no option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8