Karnataka High Court
WP/17367/2025 of SRI SIDDARTH BAGRECHA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21957 WP No. 17367 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 17367 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI SIDDARTH BAGRECHA S/O MUKESH BAGRECHA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/ A NO-55, LALBAGH
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 17367 OF 2025 (LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI SIDDARTH BAGRECHA
S/O MUKESH BAGRECHA,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
R/A NO-55, LALBAGH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 027.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN HEGDE., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
MS BUILDING,
BANGALORE 560 001.
2.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER.
KOLLEGALA SUB DIVISION,
KOLLEGALA,
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571440.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR.
HANURU, KOLLEGALA.
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571440.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.S.R.KHAMROZ KHAN., AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF TH CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE
ORDERS OF THE HONBLE 2ND RESPONDENT IN LRF (79A-79B)
CR 05/2017-18 DATED 25-02-2020 AS PER ANNEXURE-B, AS
PER ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of forfeiture passed by the Assistant Commissioner dated 25.02.2020, invoking the provisions of Section 83 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, for violation of the provisions contained in Section 79A and 79B of the Act.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in
HC-KAR
W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner.
4. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority.
5. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the
HC-KAR
Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner.
6. Having considered the submissions of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar
HC-KAR
and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein.
7. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following:
ORDER
i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 25.02.2020, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 11.05.2026, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner.
HC-KAR
Ordered accordingly.
8. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT/- CT: JL