Karnataka High Court
WP/5413/2026 of SMT. ZAKIR UNNISA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21448 WP No. 5413 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5413 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ZAKIR UNNISA W/O S.K. MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO. 10, 1ST CROSS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 5413 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. ZAKIR UNNISA
W/O S.K. MAHABOOB,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE,
RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M.S. PALYA,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
2.
SRI. SHET
S/O P. PUTTARADA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR,
M.S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA,
BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097.
3.
SRI. C. NAGAPPA
S/O CHINASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
NO. 24, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
SAMBHRAM COLLEGE,
RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M. S. PALYA,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
4.
SRI. APSAR PASHA,
S/O M. ABDUL SATHAR,
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
NO. 06, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR,
CHIKKABETTAHALLI, VIDYARANYAPURA,
BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097.
5.
SRI. PRABHU RASAPPAN
S/O RASAPPAN
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
NO. 14, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, M.S. PALYA,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
6.
SRI. SASI KUMAR
S/O NOT KNOWN,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
NO. 14, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE,
RAJIV GANDHI COLONY, M. S. PALYA,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
7.
SRI. MOHAMMED JAMSHEED D.
S/O MOHAMMED DASTAGIR,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
NO. 14, SAMBHRAM COLLEGE,
RAJIV GANDHI COLONY, MS PALYA,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
8.
SRI. SYED SHAFIULLA
S/O SYED DASTAGIRI SAHEB,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
NO. 21, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR,
HC-KAR
CHIKKABETTAHALLI,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU - 560097.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KEMPE GOWDA C.M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA,
BENGALURU - 560 064.
4.
THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE,
REP. BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA,
BENGALURU - 560 064.
5.
THE COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA SLUM BOARD,
SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020.
6.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
4TH SUB-DIVISION, NO.55,
HC-KAR
RISALDAR STREET, SHESHADRIPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 020.
7.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER,
YELAHANKA SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP/GBA, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPE,
BENGALURU - 560 064.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN
BY THE PRESIDENT MR. S. MANJUNATH, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR
SUVARNA KARNATAKA KARMIKE VEDIKE, ON BEHALF OF THE
PETITIONERS AND OTHERS AND TO ISSUE POSSESSION
CERTIFICATE
TO
THEIR
RESPECTIVE
HOUSES
AS
PER
ANNEXURE-Q AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Notice to the other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons.
HC-KAR
2. Although the prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the representation at Annexure-Q, learned Additional Government Advocate points out that the representation at Annexure-Q is given by 'Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Suvarna Karnataka Karmikara Vedike' and not by the petitioners. It is submitted that no specific information regarding the petitioners is forthcoming from the representations.
3. Upholding the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to give representation to the competent authority to consider the grievances of the petitioners.
Ordered accordingly.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv, Sl No.: 1