Karnataka High Court
WP/25380/2025 of LOKESH K R Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21411 WP No. 25380 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 25380 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: LOKESH K.R, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O LATE. RAMASWAMY REDDY, R/AT NERIGA VILLAGE,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 25380 OF 2025 (LR)
BETWEEN:
LOKESH K.R,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
S/O LATE. RAMASWAMY REDDY,
R/AT NERIGA VILLAGE, KUGUR POST,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAGESH M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
MS BUILDINGS, VIDHANA VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE SPL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,
KANDAYABHAVANA, KG ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
3.
SRI. THIMMARAYA SWAMY TEMPLE
NERIGA VILLAGE, KUGURU POST,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
REP. BY MUZRAI OFFICER
CUM TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER
DATED 04/04/2025 IN REVENUE APPEAL NO. 439 OF 2007
VIDE ANNEXURE -E PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU WHICH CONFIRMED THE ORDERS OF
THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 08/03/2007 IN INA.CR.
51/98-99 AND INA.CR. 6/2004-05 VIDE ANNEXURE- D BY
ALLOWING THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 09.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 17.04.2026 for "Dismissal".
HC-KAR
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12