Karnataka High Court
WP/15064/2025 of SRI APPEGOWDA Vs THE PRESIDENT on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21638 WP No. 15064 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 15064 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SRI. APPEGOWDA S/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O HUCHHANAPALYA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 15064 OF 2025 (KLR-REG)
BETWEEN:
SRI. APPEGOWDA
S/O THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/O HUCHHANAPALYA,
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
BENGALURU.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE PRESIDENT
LAND GRANT COMMITTEE
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
4.
THE PANCHAVATI TRUST (REGD)
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
NO. 3412, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 038.
5.
THE BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 027.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLS 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
DTD. 14.05.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE KARNATAKA
APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU IN MATTER BEARING
RP NO 107/2015.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 09.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.
HC-KAR
If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 17.04.2026 for "Dismissal".
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8