Karnataka High Court
WP/18802/2025 of SRI CHUNCHEGOWDA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21643 WP No. 18802 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 18802 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. CHUNCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O SHIVEGOWDA, R/O ANANDUR VILLAGE,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 18802 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHUNCHEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O SHIVEGOWDA,
R/O ANANDUR VILLAGE, ILWALA HOBLI,
MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 571 130.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P.V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDAKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MYSORE DISTRICT,
MYSORE - 570 001.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
MYSORE SUB DIVISION,
MYSORE - 570 001.
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
4.
THE THASILDHAR
MYSORE TALUK
MYSORE - 570 001.
5.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KODAGU DISTRICT
MADAKERI - 571 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I. WRIT OF
CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR WRIT / ORDERS OR
DIRECTION
AND
TO
QUASH
LETTER
BEARING
NO
TAH/MYS/RRT(I)/CR-02/2024-25
DATED
12.07.2024
AT
ANNEXURE-C THE BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT THASLIDHAR AND
PROCEEDINGS IN RP 168/2024 ON THE 5TH RESPONDENT
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KODAGU AT ANNEXURE E AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 09.04.2026 stating that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute this writ petition.
HC-KAR
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3