Karnataka High Court
WP/5236/2023 of SRI. G. GANGADHAR Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21642 WP No. 5236 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5236 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. G. GANGADHAR S/O GANGAPPA, AGRICULTURIST BY OCCUPATION, AGED 52 YEARS,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21642
WP No. 5236 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 5236 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. GANGADHAR
S/O GANGAPPA,
AGRICULTURIST BY OCCUPATION,
AGED 52 YEARS,
NO.270, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
VINAYAKA ALYOUT,
NAGARBHAVI, 1ST STAGE, 9TH BLOCK,
BANGALORE - 560 072.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARUN ASHOK GADAG, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,
FOURTH FLOOR, DC OFFICE BUILDING,
REVENUE COMPLEX, K.G.ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
SRI. K.A. RAMACHANDRA REDDY
S/O LATE C. ANNAIAH REDDY,
AGED 56 YEARS,
KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPUR HOBLI,
ANEKAL VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21642
WP No. 5236 of 2023
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
PASSED BY THE OF THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU (CCH-1) IN APPEAL NO.223/2016 DTD 28.08.2020
THEREBY ALLOWING THE APPEAL NO.223/2016 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 09.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted for compliance of office objection. If office objection is not complied, list this for dismissal on 17.04.2026.
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objection has not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objection.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5