Karnataka High Court

WP/20485/2024 of SRI B N GURUSHANTHAPPA Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 21 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:21663 WP No. 20485 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 20485 OF 2024 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SRI B N GURUSHANTHAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/ A

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 20485 OF 2024 (KLR-REG)

BETWEEN:

SRI B N GURUSHANTHAPPA

S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

R/A BHUTHESHWARA NAGARA,

MEKARAHALLI POST, SIRA TALUK,

TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT N., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR.

2.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

TUMKUR SUB DIVISION

TUMKUR.

3.

THE TAHASILDAR & THE SECRETARY

TO LAND GRANT CONSULTATION COMMITTEE

SIRA TALUK, SIRA,

TUMKUR DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA)

Digitally signed

by JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING

THE R1 TO 3 AS THE CASE MAY BE TO CONSIDER AND TO

PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY

THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO.50 AND FORM NO.57 FOR THE

REGULARIZATION OF THE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF

THE LAND IN SY.NO.12 OF MUDIGERE KAVAL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT MEASURING 4

ACRES WITHIN SHORTEST PERIOD OF TIME.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for all the respondents.

2. It is the contention of the petitioner that he has filed applications in Form No.50 on 21.08.1991 and Form No.57 on 11.03.2019 seeking regularization of unauthorized occupation of 4 acres of land in Sy.No.12 of Mudigere Kaval Village, Kasaba Hobli, Sira Taluk, Tumakuru District and till date, the applications have not been considered. Therefore, the prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent- authorities to consider the applications filed by the

HC-KAR

petitioner seeking regularization of unauthorized occupation of 4 acres of land in Sy.No.12 of Mudigere Kaval Village, Kasaba Hobli, Sira Taluk, Tumakuru District.

3. Having regard to the contentions raised in the writ petition and submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that respondent-Tahsildar was duty bound to place the applications filed by the petitioner before the ‘Committee for Regularization of Unauthorized Occupation’ and the Committee was also duty bound to consider the applications and pass necessary orders.

4. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to respondent-Tahsildar, Sira Taluk, to verify from the records as to whether such applications in Form No.50 and Form No.57 are pending consideration. If it is found that such applications were indeed filed by the petitioner and the applications are yet to be considered, the respondent-Tahsildar is directed to place before the ‘Committee for Regularization of

HC-KAR

Unauthorised Occupation’ the applications along with his recommendation within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall consider the applications and pass necessary orders in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months. Ordered accordingly.

Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

JT/- CT: JL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead