Karnataka High Court
WP/14797/2025 of CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES Vs THE LAND TRIBUNAL on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21640 WP No. 14797 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14797 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES (EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION) BENGALURU ZONE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 14797 OF 2025 (LR)
BETWEEN:
CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
(EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION)
BENGALURU ZONE (KARNATAKA),
BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, NO.13.
RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 025.
(STATUTORY ORGANISATION ESTABLISHED
UNDER THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952)
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. VARSHA HITTINHALLI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE NORTH, KANDAYA BHAVAN,
DC OFFICE RD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
M.B. RAMACHANDRAN
S/O LATE BYRAPPA
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2(A).
SMT. M. HEMALTHA
W/O LATE M.B. RAMACHANDRAN
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
R/AT NO.55, NANDIDURGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 046.
2(B).
SRI. R. PRAVEEN
S/O LATE M.B. RAMACHANDRAN
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/AT NO.55, NANDIDURGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 046.
2(C).
SRI. PAVITHRA R
D/O LATE M.B. RAMACHANDRAN
W/O Y SURENDRA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT NO.55, NANDIDURGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 046.
ALSO AT NO.33, 13TH CROSS
AECS LAYOUT, SANJAY NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 094.
2(D).
SRI. PALLAVI R
S/O LATE M.B. RAMACHANDRAN
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.55, NANDIDURGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 046.
3.
M.B.GOVINDARAJU
S/O LATE BYRAPPA
3(A).
SMT. G. VEENA
S/O M.B. GOVINDARAJU
W/O SRI RAJESH
HC-KAR
3(A)(i)
SRI. RAJESH S
HUSBAND OF LATE G. VEENA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
3(A)(ii)
MISS. AISHWARYA R
S/O LATE G. VEENA
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
NOS. 3(A)(i) AND 3(A)(ii)
R/AT NO.13, 11TH A CROSS
SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU - 560 003.
4.
SRI. AZMATHULLA MEKHRI
FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER
AGED MAJOR
R/AT NO.21, 2ND MAIN
VASANTHNAGAR EAST
BENGALURU - 560 052.
5.
SRI. FAZALULLA MEKHRI
FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER
5(A).
SRI. KHAMAR MEKRI
W/O LATE AZMATHELLAL MEKHRI
AGED MAJOR
R/AT NO.30, 7TH CROSS
5TH MAIN ROAD, VASANTHNAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 052.
HC-KAR
6.
SMT. MARIA PHILOMENA
D/O A. MICHEAL
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
7.
SRI. A.M. ANTO MICHEAL
S/O A. MICHEAL
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
8.
SMT. A.M SAGAYA MARIA
D/O A.MICHEAL
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
9.
SMT. A.M.TONY MARIA
D/O.A.MICHEAL
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
NOS. 6 TO 9 ARE
RESIDING AT NO.2,
JAI BHARATHI NAGAR,
CHINNASWAMI PILLAI ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 033.
10.
SRI. B.M. VENKATA REDDY
S/O LATE B.A. MUNISWAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/AT MELR VILLAGE
SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 102.
11.
SRI. B.M. RAMACHANDRA REDDY
S/O LATE B.A. MUNISWAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT BANNIKUPPA VILLAGE
NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 102.
HC-KAR
12.
SRI. N. SRINIVAS
S/O LATE M. NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
R/AT NO.97/1, WHEELERS ROAD,
COX TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
13.
SRI. SHIVAPPA GOWDA
S/O LATE B.K. BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/AT NO.10, P. RAMASWAMY ROAD,
J.C. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 06.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN
CASE NO. LRF/INA/25, 25A/1998-99 OF TH NORTH ZONE IN
THE LAND TRIBUNAL AND ETC..,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 09.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 17.04.2026 for "Dismissal".
HC-KAR
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7