Karnataka High Court
WP/22113/2025 of SRI P DHARMI CHAND Vs THE TALUK LAND SURVEYOR on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21410 WP No. 22113 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 22113 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. P. DHARMI CHAND, S/O. LATE SRI. B. PUKHRAJ, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, CARRYING
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21410
WP No. 22113 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 22113 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. P. DHARMI CHAND,
S/O. LATE SRI. B. PUKHRAJ,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
CARRYING ON BUSINESS AT
PARAMESHWARA JEWELLERS,
MARKET ROAD, HOSKOTE TOWN - 562 114.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PARAS JAIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE TALUK LAND SURVEYOR
HOSKOTE - 562 114,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WHEREFORE, THE
PETITIONERS ABOVE NAMED PRAYS THAT THIS HONBLE
COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
CERTIORARI OR SUCH OTHER ORDER OR WRIT INTER ALIA
QUASHING THE NOTICES DATED NIL BEARING NO. THHSK- LNDO NCR 68/2025 ISSUED BY THE TALUK LAND SURVEYOR, HOSKOTE, (ANNEXURE-F, H AND K TO THIS WRIT PETITION)
AND FURTHER PRAYS THAT THE TALUK LAND SURVEYOR, HOSKOTE, TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE
PETITIONER ON 13/04/2024 BE DIRECTED TO RECTIFY RTC
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21410
WP No. 22113 of 2025
WHICH SHOWS ERRONEOUSLY THE 30 GUNTAS OF LAND AS
KHARAB LAND, WHICH IS NOT (ANNEXURE L) AND PRAYS FOR
SUCH FOR SUCH OTHER ORDER AS THIS HONBLE COURT
DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF
THE CASE IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 09.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 17.04.2026 for "Dismissal".
2. Office objections have not been complied with.
3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11