Karnataka High Court
WP/9607/2026 of SRI SOMLA NAIKA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21446 WP No. 9607 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 9607 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. SOMLA NAIKA S/O. DAMLA NAIKA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/AT YENNEKOPA, SORABA,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21446
WP No. 9607 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 9607 OF 2026 (LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SOMLA NAIKA
S/O. DAMLA NAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS,
R/AT YENNEKOPA, SORABA,
SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA - 577 413.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF PARLIMENTARY
AFFAIRS AND LEGISLATION
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR
TALUK OFFICE,
MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA BUILDING
SHIRALA KOPPA ROAD, SORABA,
SHIVMOGA DISTRICT, SHIVMOGA - 577 429.
3.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL
TALUK OFFICE, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA BUILDING
SHIRALA KOPPA ROAD, SORABA,
SHIVMOGA DISTRICT,
SHIVMOGA - 577 429
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21446
WP No. 9607 of 2026
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT
OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER
OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE
ISSUED IN FORM NO.10 DATED 13.08.1983 IN RESPECT OF
THE SCHEDULE LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.99, PRODUCED
HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as per the instruction of the petitioner.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4