Karnataka High Court
WP/19606/2025 of SMT. SUJAYA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21408 WP No. 19606 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19606 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUJAYA W/O SHIVRAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 2. SRI. SUSHAN S/O SHIVRAM, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 19606 OF 2025 (LR)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SUJAYA
W/O SHIVRAM,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
2.
SRI. SUSHAN
S/O SHIVRAM,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
3.
SRI. SHEETHAL
S/O SHIVRAM,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT 'ANUGRAHA',
MAHAVEER COLLEGE ROAD,
MUDABIDIRE, MUDABIDRE TALUK,
DAKSHINAKANNADA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.S. NARESH SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
MUDIBIDRE, MUDIBIDRE TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.
3.
SRI. NEELAIAH POOJARY
S/O THOODUPOOJARY,
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS,
NEAR MADASAMPIGE HANDERU SCHOOL,
PUTTIGE VILLAGE, MUDIBIDIRE TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORART OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION QUASHING
THE ORDER DATED 3.6.2022 IN CASE NO.TRL/2336/76-77, PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL, MUDIBIDIRE, A COPY OF
WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 09.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.
HC-KAR
If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 17.04.2026 for "Dismissal".
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10