Karnataka High Court
CRP/259/2026 of SMT. R SHARMILA Vs SRI. B DEVA KUMAR on 21 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:21645 CRP No. 259 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 259 OF 2026 (EX) BETWEEN: SMT. R. SHARMILA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O GIRISH NASHI, R/AT SHIVALINGA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21645
CRP No. 259 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 259 OF 2026 (EX)
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. SHARMILA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
W/O GIRISH NASHI,
R/AT SHIVALINGA NILAYA,
NO. 76, N.N. FARM ROAD,
SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 094
REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER
GIRISH NASHI,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
SON OF LATE K.G.NASHI,
R/AT SHIVALINGA NILAYA,
NO.76, N.N.FARM ROAD,
SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 094
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C.M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. B. DEVA KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
S/O LATE BASAVALINGAPPA
R/AT NO. 43, 1ST MAIN,
SHREYA COLONY, J.P NAGAR,
7TH PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 078.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:21645
CRP No. 259 of 2026
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2026 PASSED ON IA NO.II/2026 IN
EX NO.208/2016 ON THE FILE OF XXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU., DISMISSING THE IA
NO.II/2026 FILED UNDER SEC.151 OF CPC., TO RE-CALL
DELIVERY WARRANT ISSUED VIDE ORDER DATED 28.01.2026.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 10.04.2026 stating that the respondents have taken possession of the property through Court and therefore, the prayer made in this writ petition has become infructous.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exception.
Accordingly, the CRP stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2