Karnataka High Court

WP/2006/2024 of SRI. RAJAPPA Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 16 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:20600 WP No. 2006 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, RESIDING AT NO. 78,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI. RAJAPPA

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA,

RESIDING AT NO. 78,

MUTHAGATTI VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA M.V, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

AND:

1.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,

K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.

2.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION,

2ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVANA,

K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.

3.

THE THASILDHAR

ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106.

4.

SRI. SIDDAPPA

Digitally signed

by JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

S/O LATE KAKAPPA

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

R/AT MUTHAGATTI VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.

5.

SMT. SHANTHAMMA

W/O LATE PAPANNA

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,

SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.

6.

SMT. S. GOWRAMMA

W/O C CHINNAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 330, GOKULA LAYOUT,

WARD NO. 08, ANEKAL TOWN,

KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.

7.

SRI. C. GANESH BABU

S/O C. CHINNAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 702, 7TH FLOOR,

SUNCITY APARTMENTS, STAR BLOCK,

SARJAPURA OUTER RING ROAD,

BANGALORE SOUTH,

BANGALORE - 560 102.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) CALL FOR THE

HC-KAR

RECORDS FROM R1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU

URBAN DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, IN REVISION PETITION NO.

304/2019-2020 AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."

2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.

3. Office objections have not been complied with.

4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

rv, List No.2, Sl No.: 5

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead