Karnataka High Court
WP/2006/2024 of SRI. RAJAPPA Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 16 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20600 WP No. 2006 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, RESIDING AT NO. 78,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA,
RESIDING AT NO. 78,
MUTHAGATTI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA M.V, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION,
2ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVANA,
K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
3.
THE THASILDHAR
ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106.
4.
SRI. SIDDAPPA
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
S/O LATE KAKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/AT MUTHAGATTI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.
5.
SMT. SHANTHAMMA
W/O LATE PAPANNA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.
6.
SMT. S. GOWRAMMA
W/O C CHINNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 330, GOKULA LAYOUT,
WARD NO. 08, ANEKAL TOWN,
KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.
7.
SRI. C. GANESH BABU
S/O C. CHINNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 702, 7TH FLOOR,
SUNCITY APARTMENTS, STAR BLOCK,
SARJAPURA OUTER RING ROAD,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE - 560 102.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) CALL FOR THE
HC-KAR
RECORDS FROM R1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU
URBAN DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, IN REVISION PETITION NO.
304/2019-2020 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv, List No.2, Sl No.: 5