Karnataka High Court
WP/11498/2026 of SRI C A MATHEW Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 16 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20688 WP No. 11498 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 11498 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. C.A.MATHEW, S/O C.M.ANTHONY CHETTU PUZHA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT CHEROOTY
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 11498 OF 2026 (LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. C.A.MATHEW,
S/O C.M.ANTHONY CHETTU PUZHA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT CHEROOTY ROAD,
CALICUT,
KERALA - 673 032.
REPRESENTED BY HIS
GPA HOLDER
SRI. NAGARAJ.C,
S/O CHOWDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT NO.19, 8TH MAIN ROAD,
HOSAKEREHALLI, BSK 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU - 85.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY UNDER SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
Digitally
signed by
JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
KOLLEGALA SUB-DIVISION,
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT - 571 440.
3.
TAHSILDAR,
GULDALAPETE TALUK,
GUNDALAPETE - 571 111.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING
ANNEXURE - A ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN
LRF(79A-79B)/CR/118/2018-19,
DATED
25-02-2020,
IN
RESPECT OF SY. NO.332/2 MEASURING 2 ACRES, SITUATED AT
KANNEGALA VILLAGE, HUNGALA HOBLI, GUNDALAPETE TALUK, BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner in
HC-KAR
proceedings bearing No.LRF(79A-79B)/CR/118/2018-19 dated 25.02.2020 at Annexure-A.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person.
4. Learned High Court Government Pleader points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in-spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner.
HC-KAR
5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority.
6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have
HC-KAR
reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner.
7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co- ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein.
8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following:
ORDER
i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of
HC-KAR
Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 25.02.2020, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 05.05.2026, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16