Karnataka High Court
WP/7264/2024 of SMT RATHNAMMA Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 16 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20601 WP No. 7264 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 7264 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT KODAGI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 7264 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. RATHNAMMA
W/O LATE GANGANNA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KODAGI THIRUMALAPURA,
HESARUGATTA HOBLI,
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAVEENA KUMARA NIRVANI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN,
K.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION,
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR
YALAHANKA TALUK OFFICE,
(OLD) BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BANGALORE - 560 064.
4.
SRI. ANJANAPPA
S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
5.
SRI. VENKATAPPA
S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NO.4 AND 5 ARE
RESIDING AT KODAGITHIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI,
6.
SRI.H. VISHWANATH
S/O HANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT KODAGITHIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE,
HESARAGHATTA HOBLI,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 266 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ORDER DTD 31.10.2023 ANNEXURE-S, AND ORDER DTD
07.01.2022
ANNEXURE-P
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DTD 08.12.2021 ANNEXURE-N AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6