Karnataka High Court
WP/25132/2023 of VENKATACHALA Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU on 16 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20599 WP No. 25132 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 25132 OF 2023 (SCST) BETWEEN: VENKATACHALA S/O HANUMABHOVI AED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDENT OF INDIRANAGARA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 25132 OF 2023 (SCST)
BETWEEN:
VENKATACHALA
S/O HANUMABHOVI
AED ABOUT 48 YEARS
RESIDENT OF INDIRANAGARA EXTENSION
BUKKAPATTANA VILLAGE AND HOBLI
SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 115.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DASAPPA B, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
TUMAKURU,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 101.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
MADHUGIRI SUB DIVISION,
MADHUGIRI - 572 132.
3.
THE THASILDAR
SIRA TALUK, SIRFA
TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 137.
4.
AKKAMMA
W/O LATE SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
5.
H.S. MANJUNATHA
S/O LATE SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R4 AND R5 ARE
R/O HUNE SEKATTE VILLAGE,
BUKKAPATTANA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 577 520.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R1 DTD 4.2.2022 IN PTCL
NO.5/2018 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND ALSO ORDERS PSSED IN
LND.UAG(S)44/1989-90
DTD
31.8.1990
BY
THE
R2
IN
ANNEXURE-C AND THEREBY AFFIRMING THE 2ND ORDER OF
THE R2 AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
HC-KAR
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4