Karnataka High Court

WP/32323/2024 of SRI NARAYANAREDDY Vs CHIEF SECRETARY on 16 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:20602 WP No. 32323 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 32323 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. NARAYANAREDDY SON OF LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, RESIDING AT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 32323 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI. NARAYANAREDDY

SON OF LATE GANGAIAH

AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS,

RESIDING AT B.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE

SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK

BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT - 562 106.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SUNIL T, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

AND:

1.

CHIEF SECRETARY

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

VIDHANA SOUDHA

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BANGALORE - 560 001.

2.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION

BANGALORE - 562 106.

3.

THE THASIDLHAR

ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT - 562 106.

4.

REVENUE INSPECTOR

Digitally signed

by JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

SARJAPUR CIRCLE,

ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT - 562 106.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

DATED 23/9/2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN L.N.D(S) CR NO. 450/1991-1992 ORDERED FOR REJECTING THE APPLICATION CLAIMING THE REGULARIZATION OF OCCUPANCY RIGHTS ON THE BASIS OF BAGUR HUKAM CULTIVATION WITH RESPECT TO SY NO. 85 MEASURING 2 ACRE 00 GUNTAS OF B.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE. SARAJAPUR CIRCLE, BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT AT ANNEXURE- F AND TO GRANT SUCH ANEKAL TALUK OTHER RELIEF OR RELIEFS AS A SITUATION DEMANDS TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

ORAL ORDER

On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections.

HC-KAR

Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."

2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.

3. Office objections have not been complied with.

4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead