Karnataka High Court
WP/19782/2023 of SRI CHIKKABASAVARAJU Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 16 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20604 WP No. 19782 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19782 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. CHIKKABASAVARAJU S/O SRI. VASUDEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:20604
WP No. 19782 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 19782 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHIKKABASAVARAJU
S/O SRI. VASUDEVAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT HUTTANAHALLI, CHIKKAJALA
BENGALURU NORTH
KARNATAKA - 562 157.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KHOT ARJUN RAMA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIKAS SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
THE TAHSHILDAR
YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA
BENGALURU - 560 064.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:20604
WP No. 19782 of 2023
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R3 TO
CONSIDER
THE
PETITIONERS
REPRESENTATIONS
DATED
05/07/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND CONSEQUENTLY ISSUE
DIRECTION TO THE R3, DIRECTING HIM TO ISSUE THE
COMPUTERIZED KHATA AND RTC IN RESPECT OF 2 ACRES 20
GUNTAS OF LAND SITUATED IN SY. NO. 73, UTTARAHALLI
JALA 1 HOBLI, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU IN FAVOUR OF THE
PETITIONER AS SOUGHT FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
2. Office objections have not been complied with.
3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3