Karnataka High Court
WP/36301/2024 of SRI A S RAMASWAMY Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER on 16 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20603 WP No. 36301 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 36301 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. A.S. RAMASWAMY S/O. SRI. A . G. SHIVAPPA, AGE ABOUT 60 YEARS,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:20603
WP No. 36301 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 36301 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. A.S. RAMASWAMY
S/O. SRI. A. G. SHIVAPPA,
AGE ABOUT 60 YEARS,
OCC-AGRICULTURIST,
R/AT NO.1109, SHIVA KRUPA NILAYA,
POORNACHANDRA TEJASWI ROAD,
KUVEMPU NAGARA,
CHENNARAYAPATNA TOWN AND TALUK,
HASSAN-DISTRICT - 573 116.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
TALUK OFFICE, HASSAN
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
2.
THE THASILDAR,
HASSAN,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO THE
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:20603
WP No. 36301 of 2024
2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION
GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 25/03/2024 AS PER
ANNEXURE A AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO FURNISH THE
DOCUMENTS
SOUGHT
BY
THE
PETITIONER
TO
THE
PETITIONER HEREIN AT THE EARLIEST.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
2. Office objections have not been complied with.
3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8