Karnataka High Court
WP/2530/2026 of SMT SUSHEELA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20410 WP No. 2530 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUSHEELA W/O G.S.LINGANNA AGE 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, 2. SRI. K.T.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SUSHEELA
W/O G.S.LINGANNA
AGE 52 YEARS,
OCC : AGRICULTURE,
2.
SRI. K.T. RAMACHANDRA,
S/O THIMMARAIAH
AGE 58 YEARS,
OCC : AGRICULTURE,
3.
SRI. K.M LAXMANA GOUDA,
S/O MARANNA,
AGE 70 YEARS,
OCC : AGRICULTURE,
ALL ARE R/O
KEMPADYAPANAHALLI VILLAGE,
BIDADI HOBLI,
TALUK AND DIST. RAMNAGARA,
RAMNAGARA-562 109.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. GEETHA A., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
RAMANAGARA, TQ AND
DIST- RAMANAGARA
PIN CODE - 562 159.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR,
RAMANAGARA TALUK,
RAMANAGARA- 562 159.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY MR.S.R.KHAMRPZ KHAN, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27-10-2025 VIDE
ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 TO THE WRIT
PETITION INSOFAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND
ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for all the respondents.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that the order impugned at Annexure-E is passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Ramanagara Sub- Division, invoking Rule 108(K) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 (for short 'the Rules') while cancelling the grant made in favour of the petitioner. Such an order if considered as original order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Rule 108(K) of the Rules, then the appeal would lie to the Deputy Commissioner under Section 49(b) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act'). If the order impugned is considered an order under appeal under Section 49(b) of the Act, then a second appeal would lie to the Deputy Commissioner under Section 50 of the Act. Accepting the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, writ petition stands disposed
HC-KAR
of reserving liberty of the petitioners to approach the Deputy Commissioner.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3