Karnataka High Court
RFA/216/2014 of M/S SHEKAR BUILDERS Vs SRI S K VENKATESH on 10 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:20112-DB RFA No. 216 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 216 OF 2014 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. M/S SHEKAR BUILDERS &
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 216 OF 2014 (MON)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S SHEKAR BUILDERS
& DEVELOPERS
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.102,
5TH FLOOR, K.H. ROAD,
ABOVE IDBI BANK, BANGALORE-27
REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS
a.
SRI. P.N.CHANDRASHEKAR,
S/O P.V.NANJUNDA RAO,
AGED 43 YEARS,
b.
SRI. K.VIJAY KUMAR,
S/O LATE KEMPAIAH,
AGED 53 YEARS,
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M S PRAKASH., DVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI S K VENKATESH
S/O KEMPANNA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B
K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SRI. K. RAMU @ TEMPO RAMANNA
S/O KEMPANNA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
BOTH THE RESPONDENTS ARE
R/AT NO.90/71, 2ND CROSS,
LALBAGH ROAD, SIDDAPURA-I BLOCK
JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560011
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. A SHIVARAMA & ASSTS FOR R2;
V/O DATED 19.02.20216, APPEAL ABATED AGAINST R1)
*******
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:29.08.2013
PASSED IN O.S.6452/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV-ADDL.
CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
1. This appeal is of the year 2014. There is no representation for the appellant either in the first call or in the revised call.
2. However, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
3. We therefore, dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4