Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4642/2026 of MR. VINOD KESAVAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:19420 CRL.P No. 4642 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4642 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR. VINOD KESAVAN S/O LATE P.A.K KUTTY, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:19420
CRL.P No. 4642 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4642 OF 2026
(439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
MR. VINOD KESAVAN
S/O LATE P.A.K KUTTY,
AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/A NO.12 INDRASREE,
1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
AMARJYOTHI LAYLOUT,
NEAR SRISHTI APARTMENTS ,
BANGALORE NORTH, R T NAGAR,
BENGALURU – 560 032.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RADHIKA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ELECTRONIC CITY POLICE
BENGALURU – 561 00
INVESTIGATING BY CID (EOCD)
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSEDCUTOR
HILGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENFGALURU – 560 100.
…RESPONDENT
(BY Ms. ASMA KOUSER., ADDL. SPP)
Digitally
signed by
PAVITHRA
N
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:19420
CRL.P No. 4642 of 2026
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS)
BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.327/2025 NOW
CC.NO.45834/2025 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE
CJM BENGLAURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU OF CID
POLICE, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTION 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The said memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NR/- List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13