CRL.P/1811/2026 of GANGADEVI K S Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 7 April 2026

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner/accused No.1 is before this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.233/2025 of respondent-police for the offence under Sections 318(4), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNS’).

Brief facts of the case:

2. The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner is a distant relative of the mother of the complainant. On account of said acquaintance, it is alleged that, the petitioner represented herself as a person having close connection with

HC-KAR

several HR managers and Managing Directors of reputed Multinational Companies and informed the complainant that other persons are also well acquainted with senior officials in MNC Companies and had previously assisted several candidates in securing the employment.

3. It is further alleged that the petitioner assured the complainant that they would get him a suitable job in a multinational Company and he would get Rs.80,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/- salary. It is further stated that upon persistent demand, the complainant had paid amount of Rs.25,00,000/- hoping that he would get the suitable job to build his career. However, he did not get any suitable job despite he paid the said amount.

4. The complainant being frustrated for not getting good job, he insisted the petitioner to return his money. However, the accused No.3 threatened the complainant that he is a rowdy sheeter and he knew what to do to close the issue. Further, the complainant was warned that he should not insist the petitioner and others to refund the amount.

HC-KAR

5. Based on the complaint, the respondent-police registered a case in Cr.No.233/2025 against the petitioner and the investigation is under progress.

6. Heard Sri. Pruthveen Pralhad Kattimani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Anitha Girish N, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent -State.

7. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the petitioner is a lady, aged about 30 years and a resident of Kondahalli Village, Magadi Taluk. The averments of the complaint did not disclose the name of the petitioner, though it is alleged in the said complaint that, the complainant has paid amounts on different occasions to the different accounts. The fact remains that, the petitioner would co-operate with the investigation. Hence, she may be enlarged on bail by imposing suitable conditions. Moreover, the alleged offences neither punishable with death nor imprisonment for life. Making such submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays to allow the petition.

HC-KAR

8. Per contra, the learned HCGP for respondent State vehemently submitted that, the amount of Rs.23,00,000/- has been paid to the petitioner and others on the pretext that they would secure him a good job in a Multinational Company. However, the complainant has been cheated by the complainant and others.

9. It is further submitted that the manner in which the petitioner and others have cheated the complainant has to be investigated properly. Moreover, whether the petitioner and others have committed any similar offences on the other unemployed youths or not has also to be investigated. Therefore, it is not appropriate to grant any relief, as prayed for in the petition. Making such submissions, he prays to reject the petition.

10. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and on perusal of the averments of the complaint, it appears that the petitioner is the distant relative of the complainant. The complainant was assured that he would get a good job in Multinational Companies and received amount of Rs.23,00,000/- as a token of advance. The manner in which the

HC-KAR

petitioner has been cheated has not properly been stated in the complaint. However, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner is a woman aged about 30 years, if suitable conditions are imposed and granted bail, the apprehension of the prosecution would be met. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The petition is allowed.

(ii) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.233/2025 of respondent-police for the aforesaid offences on executing personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within a period of one month from today

(iv) The petitioner shall co-operate with investigation till filing of the final report.

HC-KAR

(v) The petitioner shall not threaten or tamper the prosecution witnesses nor hamper the proceedings of the Court.

(vi) The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on all hearing dates without fail.

(vii) The petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal cases, till disposal of the case.

In case, if the petitioner violates any of the bail conditions as stated above, liberty is reserved to the prosecution to file necessary application for cancellation of bail.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

JS, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3