Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9677/2025 of SHAHID A M Vs UNION OF INDIA on 2 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:18002 CRL.P No. 9677 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9677 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHAHID A M S/O. AHAMMED KUTTY ARIPPATTA MANNIL AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9677 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC)
/ 483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SHAHID A M
S/O. AHAMMED KUTTY ARIPPATTA
MANNIL
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/OF C-21, EMERALD ENCLAVE,
HEBBAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VTC,
INFOSYS CAMPUS, SUB DISTRICT
MYSORE,
KARNATAKA - 570027
P/R AT. SHANTHIMAHAL
THRIKKALAYOUR,
KIZHUPORAMBA, ARAKODE,
MALAPPURAM, KERALA - 673639
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AKASH RAJU.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
NARAYANA
UMA
Location:
High Court
of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
UNION OF INDIA
BY NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
BZU, REPRESENTED BY
THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR
NCB, BANGALORE-560001.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHRIDEVI BHOSALE MARUTI., CGC)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL , IN
CR.NO.48/1/18/2025/BZU
REGISTERED
WITH
THE
RESPONDENT NCB BANGALORE FOR OFFENCES PUNISHBLE
UNDER SECTION 8(c) READ WITH SECTIONS 20(b)(ii)(c), 23(c), 28, AND 29 OF THE NDPS ACT, WHICH IS PENDING
BEFORE THE HONBLE XXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE
AND
SPECIAL
JUDGE
FOR
NDPS,
BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file fresh petition.
Considering the same, leave is granted as prayed for.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1