Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/37/2016 of SRI P RAMANNA RAI Vs SRI JAGANNATHA RAI on 27 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:12383 CRL.A No. 37 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2016 ( A ) BETWEEN: SRI P. RAMANNA RAI, S/O. MUTHAPPA RAI, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT VAILALA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:12383
CRL.A No. 37 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2016 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI P. RAMANNA RAI,
S/O. MUTHAPPA RAI,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT VAILALA HOUSE,
PERAJE VILLAGE,
SULLIA TALUK
D.K. DIST - 574 239.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE
VIDE ORDER DATED 12/12/2025)
AND:
SRI JAGANNATHA RAI
S/O. THYAMPANNA RAI,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT BINTHODY HOUSE,
MADAVU VILLAGE & KAVU POST
D.K. DIST - 574 223.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SACHIN B S., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 06.11.2015
PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE,
D.K.,
MANGALORE
SITTING
AT
PUTTUR
IN
CRL.A.NO.358/2013,
CONSEQUENTLY
CONFIRM
THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 19.10.2013 PASSED BY THE
PRL.
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC,
PUTTUR,
D.K.,
IN
C.C.NO.1322/2001 IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS OR FOR
REPORTING
SETTLEMENT,
THIS
DAY,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12383 CRL.A No. 37 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
It is submitted by both the learned counsel for the parties, that appellant is no more.
In view of the submission of both the learned counsel, the appeal stands abated. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42