Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/315/2026 of SMT. VENKATARAVANAMMA @ RAVANAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 23 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:11052 CRL.A No. 315 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SMT. VENKATARAVANAMMA @ RAVANAMMA W/O LATE ASHWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/ A
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SMT. VENKATARAVANAMMA @
RAVANAMMA
W/O LATE ASHWATHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/A YERAPENTA VILLAGE
PATHAPALYA HOBLI
BAGEPALLI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT -561 212
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA A.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CHIKKABALLAPURA WOMEN
POLICE STATION
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 374(2) CR.PC (FILED U/S
415(2) BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND FINE
IMPOSED PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL. DISTRICT
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE
AT
CHIKKABALLAPURA
IN
S.C.NO.93/2022 VIDE JUDGMENT DATED 04.02.2026 AND
ORDER ON SENTENCE DATED 09.02.2026 FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 370 R/W 34 OF IPC AND FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 4,5 OF IMMORAL TRAFFIC PREVENTION
ACT AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE
APPELLANT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of appeal, in which it is stated as under: “That the appellant counsel in the above appeal, pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above appeal, by oversight filing appeal on behalf of accused No.2 in the trial court, the present appeal is filed on behalf of accused No.1 and there is no instruction to file appeal on behalf of accused No.1. Hence, this memo. As such liberty may be reserved that the appellant to file fresh appeal.”
2. Memo is placed on record. In view of the memo, appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
SD/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34