Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/282/2026 of MR HASEEBULLA SHARIFF Vs MRS.SABHA SHEHAR, on 18 February 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:10052 CRL.A No. 282 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2026 ( A ) BETWEEN: 1. MR. HASEEBULLA SHARIFF S/O SRI. FIYAZ SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2026 (A)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. HASEEBULLA SHARIFF
S/O SRI. FIYAZ SHARIFF
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.1472
4TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE
RAJEEV NAGARA, MYSURU.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. P.C.NARASIMHAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MRS.SABHA SHEHAR
W/O SRI.HASEEBULLA SHARIFF
D/O SRI.SYED SHABEER AHAMEED
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
2.
MASTER MOHAMMED IBRAHIM
S/O SRI.HASEEBULLA SHARIFF
AGED ABOUT 11 MONTHS
SINCE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IS MINOR
REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN
MOTHER MRS. SABHA SHEHAR
I.E. RESPONDENT NO.1
Digitally
signed by
GEETHA P G
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.36
MAHADEVAPURA MAIN ROAD
BEHIND PETROL BUNK
UDAYAGIRI, MYSURU.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.A. FILED UNDER SECTION 423 OF BNSS, 2023
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
04.09.2025 ON I.A.NO.II PASSED BY THE HON'BLE I ADDL
PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU IN C.MIS.NO.108/2025.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 18.02.2026, in which it is stated as under: "The Appellant submits that the above said appeal is not maintainable as objections raised by the office of this Hon'ble Court and prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the Appellant to file WRIT PETITION (F.C) instead of this appeal, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Perused the memo. In view of the memo, Criminal Appeal is dismissed.
HC-KAR
3. The appellant is permitted to file Writ Petition (FC) instead of this appeal as sought for, if permissible under law.
4. Office is directed to return the certified copies to the appellant.
SD/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15