Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/100673/2024 of THE GURUKRUPA CREDIT CO-OP SOCEITY LTD Vs JAYANTH S/O BALINDRA NAIK on 19 December 2025
NC: 2025:KHC-D:18705 CRL.A No. 100673 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100673 OF 2024 ( A ) BETWEEN: THE GURUKRUPA CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD., MAIN BRANCH, BHATKAL, REP. BY
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100673 OF 2024 (A)
BETWEEN:
THE GURUKRUPA CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD., MAIN BRANCH, BHATKAL, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, MR. VASUDEV MALLA NAIK, NOW A/A 52 YEARS, R/AT. BILALKHANDA, MUTTALLI VILLAGE, BHATKAL TQ. UTTARA KANNADA-581420.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SURESH S.BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
JAYANTH S/O. BALINDRA NAIK,
NOW A/ ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. NOT KNOWN,
R/O. BALINDRANAMANE, BENANDURU,
SARAPANAKATTE, YALAWADIKAUR VILLAGE,
TALUK. BHATKAL, UTTARA KANNADA-581420.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VENKATESH M.KHARVI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4)
OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 419(4) OF BNSS ACT, PRAYING
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 08.10.2024, PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C.
AT BHATKAL, IN C.C.NO.1079/2019 UNDER SECTION 138 OF
N.I. ACT, AND CONVICT THE RESPONDENT.
Digitally signed
by SAMREEN
AYUB DESHNUR
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER
ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS
UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH)
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant being aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court.
2. However, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1, held in paragraph No.10 as under: “10. As already noted, the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC was inserted in the statute book only with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC, irrespective of whether he is a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a 1 2025 SCC Online SC 1320
HC-KAR
complainant, he can still proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub-section (4) of Section 378 of the Cr.PC.”
3. On careful reading of the judgment of the Apex Court supra, it is evident that, the complainant being victim has to file an appeal against the order of acquittal before the Jurisdictional Sessions Court by invoking Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
4. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court, in Celestial supra, the appeal by the complainant against the order of acquittal is not maintainable before this Court. Since this Court has no jurisdiction to decide the appeal on merit, the appeal is transferred to jurisdictional Appellate Court/Sessions Court.
5. The parties shall appear before the jurisdictional Appellate Court / Sessions Court on 27.01.2026, without further notice of the concerned Court.
HC-KAR
6. The Registry shall transmit entire appeal papers including appeal memo to the jurisdictional Sessions Court.
7. The learned counsel for the appellant shall have the liberty to carry out the amendment in the cause title and also the provisions thereof.
8. For statistical purpose, this appeal stands disposed off.
9. Ordered accordingly.
SD/- (S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE
RH/CT: UMD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3