Karnataka High Court
CCC/100403/2025 of WASIM S/O ABDUL GAFFAR SANADI Vs RUDRESH GHALI on 18 December 2025
NC: 2025:KHC-D:18617-DB CCC No. 100403 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100403 OF 2025 BETWEEN: WASIM S/O ABDUL GAFFAR
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100403 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
WASIM S/O ABDUL GAFFAR SANADI
AGE: 40 YEARS
OCC: CLASS-I CONTRACTOR
R/O. #60 AZAD COLONY KESHWAPUR
HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI.S.B.DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RUDRESH GHALI
THE COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER HDMC
HUBBALLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
HUBBALLI DIST: DHARWAD-580009.
2.
SHANKARANAND BANSHANKARI
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF JOINT COMMISSIONER HDMC
HUBBALLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
HUBBALLI DIST: DHARAD-580009.
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI.ABHINANDAN HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA,
1950,
PRAYING TO
INITIATE
THE
CONTEMPT
PROCEEDING
AGAINST
THE
ACCUSED
NO.1
AND
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN KATTIMANI
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
HC-KAR
2/RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER
OF THIS HON’BLE COURT DATED 15/09/2025 AT ANNEXURE-A
PASSED IN W.P.NO.106798/2025 (LB-RES) AND PUNISH ACCUSED
NO.1 AND 2/RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT)
Heard learned counsel Sri.Sharanu Nandoor for complainant and learned counsel Abhinandan Hiremath for accused Nos.1 and 2.
2. The above contempt is filed alleging disobedience of order dated 15.09.2025 in W.P.No.106798/2025 wherein the learned Single Judge has passed the following order: “i. Writ petition is allowed.
ii. A writ of mandamus is issued directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.06.2025 (Annexure–A), in accordance with law and in terms of the contract entered into between the petitioner and the respondents.
HC-KAR
iii. The respondents shall verify the bills submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
iv. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits or entitlement of the petitioner’s claim.”
3. Learned counsel for accused Nos.1 and 2 submits that the entire amount as claimed by the complainant in a sum of Rs.12,40,228/- has been credited to the complainant’s account as on this day.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant would not dispute the amount being credited to the account of the complainant.
5. Learned counsel Sri.Abhinandan Hiremath for accused Nos.1 and 2 for complainant submits that the order under contempt is complied and he would submit that the contempt could be dropped.
HC-KAR
6.
Submission
of the learned counsel for the complainant and learned counsel for the accused Nos.1 and 2 are placed on record.
7. Further proceedings in the above contempt are dropped accordingly.
Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE
NC. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6