Karnataka High Court
WP/39114/2025 of SURESH. M Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 30 December 2025
NC: 2025:KHC:54862 WP No. 39114 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 39114 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SURESH. M, S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, PERMANENT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 39114 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SURESH. M,
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
PERMANENT ADDRESS, CHIKKAKALAVANCHI,
TOPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, B ANGARAPET,
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563129
PRESENTLY R/AT, NO. 2188,
DOORAVANI NAGAR, KUVEMPU NAGAR,
K R PURAM, BENGALURU - 570023
2.
MUNI VENKATAPPA
(WRONGLY SHOWN IN FIR AS MUNIYAPPA
S/O DEKA VENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/AT, CHIKKAKALAVANCHI,
THOPPANAHALLI, KOLAR 563129.
3.
LAKSHMAMMA
(WRONGLY SHOWN IN FIR BHULAKSHMI)
W/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT, CHIKKAKALAVANCHI,
THOPPANHALLI, KOLAR 563129.
4.
RATHNAMMA N,
W/O NAGARAJ S,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT CHIKKA YELACHAMANDE,
YELACHAMANDE, KOLAR 563129.
Digitally
signed by C
HONNUR
SAB
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
5.
DHANAMMA
(WRONGLY SHOWN IN FIR AS DHANALAKSHMI,
C/O MUNIRAJ K,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT, NO. 2188, 3RD MAIN,
CHURCH ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR VIJINAPURA,
BENGALURU NORTH, DOORVANINAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560016.
6.
SUNITHA M,
C/O RAVI KUMAR K C,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
NO.0, 1ST CROSS,
NEAR SUBHAS SCHOOL,
KARANJIKATTE, KOLAR 563101
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SOMEGOWDA A. N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
BYATARAYANAPURA P S,
BYATARAYANAPURA
SUB DIVISION BENGALURU CITY
(NOW INVESTIGATED
BY D C R E POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU EAST)
REPRESENTED BY STATE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SPP OFFICE,
HIGH COURT BUILDING
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
ANJANAMMA,
D/O RAJANNA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT NO.5/26, 2ND MAIN,
BAPUJI NAGAR, MYSORE ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560026.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1,
HC-KAR
SRI PAVAN N, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED PRAYING TO-1. CALL FOR
RECORDS2. QUASH THE IMPUGNED FIR IN CRIME NO.
387/2025,
DATED
15.11.2025,
REGISTERED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT NO.1- STATE BY BYATARAYANAPURA P S FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE
BARATHIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND 3(1)(R), 3(2)(V-A)
AND 3(1)(W) OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULE TRIBES
(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989, ARISING THEREOF
AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 7 HEREIN.
AS PRODUCED IN ANNEXURE - A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.387/2025 registered by Byatarayanapura Police Station, Bengaluru City for offences under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v-a), 3(1)(w) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is present before the Court. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed vakalath and same is taken on record.
HC-KAR
3. The petitioners and respondent No.2 jointly submit that respondent No.2 has married petitioner No.1. It is submitted that marriage is solemnized on 14.12.2025.
4. The petitioners and respondent No.2 have also filed joint application stating that marriage has taken place on 14.12.2025 as per the Hindu rituals and customs at Sri Mahayaga Kshetra Sri Gayathri Devi Temple, Sri Gayathri Temple Street, Yeshwanthpur, Bengaluru.
5. The application is supported by the affidavits of all the parties to the petition.
6. The parties jointly submit that they have voluntarily settled the dispute.
7. Learned counsel would also refer to the following orders of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court:
(i) Sri.Ruthwik Chandra M vs. State of Karnataka and Another1
(ii) Akki Lakshmi Reddy vs. State of Karnataka and Another2
1 Criminal Petition No.6263/2025 2 Criminal Petition no.15001/2025
HC-KAR
(iii) Mr.Fakirappa Hatti vs. State of Karnataka and Another3
8. Considering the submission and in terms of the law laid down in the aforementioned orders, this Court does not find any impediment to accept the settlement, moreso as accused No.1 has married the complainant.
9. Hence, the following:
ORDER
(i) Joint Application filed under Section 359 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita is allowed. Consequently, the Writ petition is allowed.
(ii) FIR in Crime No.387/2025 dated 15.11.2025 registered by Byatarayanapura Police Station, Bengaluru is quashed.
(iii) Bail bond if any, stands cancelled.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
GVP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2
3 Criminal Petition No.11014/2024