Karnataka High Court

WP/11328/2023 of SRI.M. SRINIVAS Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 24 February 2025

2025:KHC:8730

2025:KHC:8730 WP No. 11328 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 11328 OF 2023 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.M. SRINIVAS S/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2. N SHIVAKUMAR W/O

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

WRIT PETITION NO. 11328 OF 2023 (LA-BDA)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI.M. SRINIVAS

S/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

2.

N SHIVAKUMAR

W/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

BOTH ARE R/AT NO.109,

HBR LAYOUT, MAGADI ROAD,

BENGALURU-560 079.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SUNDARESH H C.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPT BY ITS PRINCIAPL SECRETARY

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

M S BUILDING,

BENGALURU-560 001.

2.

THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T CHOWDAISH ROAD,

KUMARA PART WEST,

BENGALURU-560 020.

3.

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

KUMARA PART WEST,

Digitally signed

by ROOPA R U

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

Page 1 of 4

BENGALURU-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER

DATED 18.09.2005 AND 07.07.2018 AS PER ANNX-J AND K

RESPECTIVELY FOR ALLOTMENT ALTERNATIVE SITES IN LIEU

OF DEMOLISHING OF THEIR HOUSES BEARING NO. SITE NO. 6

AND 7 BLOCK NO. 1 OF SY.NO. 1 OF JB KAVAL VILLAGE, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK WITHOUT

INITIATING

ACQUISITION

PROCEEDINGS

AND

WITHOUT

PAYING COMPENSATION.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

ORAL ORDER

Petitioners are before this Court seeking issue of writ of mandamus to the respondents to consider the representations dated 18.09.2005, 07.07.2018 as per Annexures-J and K for allotment of alternate sites in lieu of demolition of their houses bearing Site Nos.6 and 7, Block No.1, situated within the land in Sy.No.1 of J.B. Kaval Village, Nandini layout, Bengaluru North Taluk.

Page 2 of 4

2. Case of the petitioners is that, they are the purchaser Site Nos. 7 and 6 respectively situated at Block No.1, within the land in Sy.No.1 of J.B. Kaval Village, Nandini layout, Bengaluru North Taluk in terms of registered deeds of sale dated 21.01.1981. That the respondent-BDA had issued notification for the formation of a residential layout. As there is provision for regularization of un-authorized occupation in urban land. The petitioners filed representations seeking regularization, in response to which the respondent-BDA issued an endorsement dated 13.09.1993 calling upon the petitioners to furnish necessary documents. Even before consideration of the said representations respondent-BDA demolished the constructions existing on the said property for formation of outer ring road, connecting Magadi Road and Tumkur Road. As such, an application for allotting for an alternate site was made by the mother of the petitioners. Despite, repeated requests there has been no response. However, certain persons were given alternate sites. Hence, the petitioners are before this Court seeking the relief of direction to the respondent- Authorities on principles of parity.

Page 3 of 4

3. Counsel for the respondent -BDA submit given some time, case of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law.

4. Hence, following;

ORDER

1. Petition is disposed of.

2. The respondent-BDA shall consider the representations dated 18.09.2005, 07.07.2018 as per Annexures-J and K of the petition and after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter if the petitioners are found eligible, appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law.

3. Such orders shall be passed within an outer limit of four (4) months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

RL List No.: 2 Sl No.: 169

Page 4 of 4

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead