Kerala High Court
Ex.FA/54/2012 of DASAN PILLAI Vs CHONAPPALLIL ENTERPRISES on 7 August 2026
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1944 EX.FA NO. 54 OF 2012 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOS 12/1988 OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER/3RD PARTY: 1 DASAN PILLAI (DIED) S/O SREEDHARAN PILLAI,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1944
EX.FA NO. 54 OF 2012
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOS 12/1988 OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER/3RD PARTY:
DASAN PILLAI (DIED)
S/O SREEDHARAN PILLAI,
THEKKEKOONAMMAKKIL,
CHERTHALA SOUTH VILLAGE,
CHERTHALA TALUK
SPPL.APPEL.
NO.2
PYARI DAS, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM
NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
SPPL.APPEL.
NO.3
ARYA DAS (MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, D/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O, ALAPPUZHA
REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PYARI DAS, AGED
40YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
SPPL.APPEL.
NO.4
AYYAPPA DAS (MINOR), AGED 16 YEARS, S/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
REPRESENTED BY HIS GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PYARI DAS, AGED
40YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
SPPL.APPEL.
NO.1
ADITHYA DAS (MINOR), AGED 14 YEARS, D/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PYARI DAS, AGED
40YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA
(ARE IMPLEADED AS THE SUPPLEMENTAL APPELLANTS 1 TO 4 AS PER
ORDER DATED 29.07.2016 IN IA.NO. 2524/2016 IN EX.FA.
NO.54/2012.)
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.)
SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P
SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS AND DEFENDANTS
:
*1
CHONAPPALLIL ENTERPRISES (DELETED)
K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM 688556,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS WHO ARE RESPONDENTS 2-6
*2
C.B. SUDHEESH (DELETED)
S/O K.G. BHASKARAN,GOVINDALAYAM,
K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE,
C.K. SASIDHARAN
S/O C.G. KUMARAN, CHONAPPALLIL, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
*4
K.S. SANALKUMAR (DELETED)
S/O BALAKRISHNAN CHONAPPALLIL, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, 688556
B. MOHANAN
S/O C.G. BHASKARAN, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
M.G. PRASANNAN
S/O C.G. GOPALAN, MATTATHIL CHIRAYIL,
K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURA VILLAGE,
CHERTHALA 688556
*7
C.G. GOPALAN (DELETED)
MATTATHIL CHIRAYIL, K.R. PURAM P.O,
PALLIPPURA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
SMT. ABMUJAKSHI BALAKRISHNAN
W/O BALAKRISHNAN, CHONAPPALLIL,
K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE,
SMT. SUSHAMA ASOKRAJ
W/O ASOKRAJ, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
*10
SMT. SUJATHA (DELETED)
W/O CHITHRABHANU, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
*11
P.K. CHITHRABHANU (DELETED)
S/O KARUNAKARAN, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
N. BALAKRISHNAN
S/O NANOO, CHONAPPALLIL, K.R.PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM
VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD
POOCHAKKAL BRANCH, 688526,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
*14
K.B PRASANNAN (DELETED)
CHKRATHIL CHIRAYIL, PALLIPPURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM
VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, 688541
SULOCHANA
VDAYAVIHAR, JOLL JUNCTION,
CHEMBU, VAIKOM 686615
SMT. SUDHAMONY
W/O P.S. ANILKUMAR, AMBALAKATTUCHIRA,
VAYALAR P.O, 688536
LEELA GOPINATHAN
AMBALAKKATTUCHIRA, VAYALAR P.O,
CHERTHALA 688536
Page 1 of 3
K.R. MANOJ
KALATHIL PARAMBU CHIRA, PATTANAKKADU P.O, CHERTHALA
688531
* RESPONDENTS 1,2,4,7,10,11 & 14 ARE DELETED FROM
THE PARTY ARRAY IN THE APPEAL AT THE RISK OF THE
APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 26.6.13 IN I.A.NO.1611
OF 2013
BY ADVS.
T.R.HARIKUMAR -R18
SRI.A.ANTONY -R13
SMT.LEELAMMA ANTONY-R13
SRI.VPK.PANICKER -R9
SMT.REMYA KRISHNAN -R9
ARJUN RAGHAVAN -R18
THIS EXECUTION FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING
ON 22.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Page 2 of 3
JUDGMENT
The appellant and the counsel remained absent. There was no representation. The appeal is against the order in execution and it is of the year 2012. This would speak volume what is behind it. The counsel for the respondents 9, 13 & 18 are present and ready with the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with cost of the abovesaid respondents. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…