Kerala High Court

Ex.FA/54/2012 of DASAN PILLAI Vs CHONAPPALLIL ENTERPRISES on 7 August 2026

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1944 EX.FA NO. 54 OF 2012 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOS 12/1988 OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER/3RD PARTY: 1 DASAN PILLAI (DIED) S/O SREEDHARAN PILLAI,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN

MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1944

EX.FA NO. 54 OF 2012

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTOS 12/1988 OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA

APPELLANT/PETITIONER/3RD PARTY:

DASAN PILLAI (DIED)

S/O SREEDHARAN PILLAI,

THEKKEKOONAMMAKKIL,

CHERTHALA SOUTH VILLAGE,

CHERTHALA TALUK

SPPL.APPEL.

NO.2

PYARI DAS, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM

NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA

SPPL.APPEL.

NO.3

ARYA DAS (MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, D/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O, ALAPPUZHA

REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PYARI DAS, AGED

40YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA

SPPL.APPEL.

NO.4

AYYAPPA DAS (MINOR), AGED 16 YEARS, S/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA

REPRESENTED BY HIS GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PYARI DAS, AGED

40YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA

SPPL.APPEL.

NO.1

ADITHYA DAS (MINOR), AGED 14 YEARS, D/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA

REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. PYARI DAS, AGED

40YEARS, W/O. LATE DASAN PILLAI, UTHRAM NIVAS, CMC-17, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA

(ARE IMPLEADED AS THE SUPPLEMENTAL APPELLANTS 1 TO 4 AS PER

ORDER DATED 29.07.2016 IN IA.NO. 2524/2016 IN EX.FA.

NO.54/2012.)

BY ADVS.

SRI.K.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.)

SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P

SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN

RESPONDENTS/

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS AND DEFENDANTS

:

*1

CHONAPPALLIL ENTERPRISES (DELETED)

K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM 688556,

REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS WHO ARE RESPONDENTS 2-6

*2

C.B. SUDHEESH (DELETED)

S/O K.G. BHASKARAN,GOVINDALAYAM,

K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE,

C.K. SASIDHARAN

S/O C.G. KUMARAN, CHONAPPALLIL, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

*4

K.S. SANALKUMAR (DELETED)

S/O BALAKRISHNAN CHONAPPALLIL, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, 688556

B. MOHANAN

S/O C.G. BHASKARAN, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

M.G. PRASANNAN

S/O C.G. GOPALAN, MATTATHIL CHIRAYIL,

K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURA VILLAGE,

CHERTHALA 688556

*7

C.G. GOPALAN (DELETED)

MATTATHIL CHIRAYIL, K.R. PURAM P.O,

PALLIPPURA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

SMT. ABMUJAKSHI BALAKRISHNAN

W/O BALAKRISHNAN, CHONAPPALLIL,

K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE,

SMT. SUSHAMA ASOKRAJ

W/O ASOKRAJ, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

*10

SMT. SUJATHA (DELETED)

W/O CHITHRABHANU, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

*11

P.K. CHITHRABHANU (DELETED)

S/O KARUNAKARAN, GOVINDALAYAM, K.R. PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

N. BALAKRISHNAN

S/O NANOO, CHONAPPALLIL, K.R.PURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM

VILLAGE, CHERTHALA 688556

THE FEDERAL BANK LTD

POOCHAKKAL BRANCH, 688526,

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

*14

K.B PRASANNAN (DELETED)

CHKRATHIL CHIRAYIL, PALLIPPURAM P.O, PALLIPPURAM

VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, 688541

SULOCHANA

VDAYAVIHAR, JOLL JUNCTION,

CHEMBU, VAIKOM 686615

SMT. SUDHAMONY

W/O P.S. ANILKUMAR, AMBALAKATTUCHIRA,

VAYALAR P.O, 688536

LEELA GOPINATHAN

AMBALAKKATTUCHIRA, VAYALAR P.O,

CHERTHALA 688536

Page 1 of 3

K.R. MANOJ

KALATHIL PARAMBU CHIRA, PATTANAKKADU P.O, CHERTHALA

688531

* RESPONDENTS 1,2,4,7,10,11 & 14 ARE DELETED FROM

THE PARTY ARRAY IN THE APPEAL AT THE RISK OF THE

APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 26.6.13 IN I.A.NO.1611

OF 2013

BY ADVS.

T.R.HARIKUMAR -R18

SRI.A.ANTONY -R13

SMT.LEELAMMA ANTONY-R13

SRI.VPK.PANICKER -R9

SMT.REMYA KRISHNAN -R9

ARJUN RAGHAVAN -R18

THIS EXECUTION FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING

ON 22.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

Page 2 of 3

JUDGMENT

The appellant and the counsel remained absent. There was no representation. The appeal is against the order in execution and it is of the year 2012. This would speak volume what is behind it. The counsel for the respondents 9, 13 & 18 are present and ready with the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with cost of the abovesaid respondents. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead