Kerala High Court
CRP/837/2004 of P.M.DAVIS Vs V.I.KURUVILLA on 4 August 2026
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1945 CRP NO. 837 OF 2004 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 120/1991 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN E.P.125/2003 IN I.A.921/1997/DEFENDANTS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1945
CRP NO. 837 OF 2004
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 120/1991 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN E.P.125/2003 IN I.A.921/1997/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 6:
P.M.DAVIS(DIED),
PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE,
P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
IT IS REPORTED THAT THE 1ST PETITIONER DIED ON 17.02.2013 HIS
WIFE BABY DAVIS (IIND PETITIONER) SUBSTANTIALLY REPRESENTS THE
ESTATE OF 1ST PETITIONER VIDE ORDER DATED 4/3/13 IN MEMO HEARING
OF NO.763/13 IN CRP.837/2004
BABY DAVIS, W/O. P.M. DAVIS
PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE,
P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
VALSA, W/O. LATE BABY,
PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE,
P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
ROBY, S/O. LATE BABY, PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM
SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENTS/
RESPONDENTS IN E.P.125/2003 IN I.A.921/1997/PLAINTIFF AND 1
ST
DEFENDANT
:
V.I.KURUVILLA, S/O ITTY MATHEW,
VALIKKODATH THAKKOL KARAN HOUSE,
PUTHANCHIRA VILLAGE, P.O. PUTHANCHIRA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
V.I.KIKKILY, W/O. JOSE, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, P.O. MARATHAKKARA-680 320, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
SIBY, S/O. LATE BABY,
PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM, P.O. CHIYYARAM-680 007, TRICHUR
DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER SR.
SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CRP NO. 837 OF 2004
O R D E R
This CRP is of the year 2004. Now, almost 19 years have elapsed. Today it is posted specifically for final hearing, but the counsel for the petitioner remained absent.
Nobody
even represented. As such, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the CRP for non-prosecution. CRP is hence dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-25/05/23
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…