Kerala High Court

CRP/837/2004 of P.M.DAVIS Vs V.I.KURUVILLA on 4 August 2026

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1945 CRP NO. 837 OF 2004 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 120/1991 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN E.P.125/2003 IN I.A.921/1997/DEFENDANTS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN

THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1945

CRP NO. 837 OF 2004

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 120/1991 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR

PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN E.P.125/2003 IN I.A.921/1997/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 6:

P.M.DAVIS(DIED),

PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE,

P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.

IT IS REPORTED THAT THE 1ST PETITIONER DIED ON 17.02.2013 HIS

WIFE BABY DAVIS (IIND PETITIONER) SUBSTANTIALLY REPRESENTS THE

ESTATE OF 1ST PETITIONER VIDE ORDER DATED 4/3/13 IN MEMO HEARING

OF NO.763/13 IN CRP.837/2004

BABY DAVIS, W/O. P.M. DAVIS

PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE,

P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.

VALSA, W/O. LATE BABY,

PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE,

P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.

ROBY, S/O. LATE BABY, PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, P.O. OLLUR-680 306, TRICHUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.

SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM

SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN

RESPONDENTS/

RESPONDENTS IN E.P.125/2003 IN I.A.921/1997/PLAINTIFF AND 1

ST

DEFENDANT

:

V.I.KURUVILLA, S/O ITTY MATHEW,

VALIKKODATH THAKKOL KARAN HOUSE,

PUTHANCHIRA VILLAGE, P.O. PUTHANCHIRA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT.

V.I.KIKKILY, W/O. JOSE, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, P.O. MARATHAKKARA-680 320, TRICHUR DISTRICT.

SIBY, S/O. LATE BABY,

PALIYAKKARA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM, P.O. CHIYYARAM-680 007, TRICHUR

DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.

SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER SR.

SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR

THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

25.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

CRP NO. 837 OF 2004

O R D E R

This CRP is of the year 2004. Now, almost 19 years have elapsed. Today it is posted specifically for final hearing, but the counsel for the petitioner remained absent.

Nobody

even represented. As such, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the CRP for non-prosecution. CRP is hence dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-25/05/23

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead