Kerala High Court
CRP(LR)/90/2018 of NELLIYATT LEELA Vs KARUNALLICHALIL VASUDEVAN on 31 October 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRP(LR) NO. 90 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.01.2011 IN O.A.3/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KUTHUPARAMBA AND THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2017 IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945
CRP(LR) NO. 90 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.01.2011 IN O.A.3/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE
LAND TRIBUNAL, KUTHUPARAMBA AND THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2017 IN AA
NO.34/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY(LR) KANNUR
REVISION PETITIONERS:
NELLIYATT LEELA
AGED 69 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.
NELLIYATT RAVEENDRAN
AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.
NELLIYARTT MOHANAN
AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.
NELLIYATT DINESHAN
AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.
NELLIYATT SATHI SHYLAJA
AGED 57 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.
NELLIYATT GOMATHI
AGED 64 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA
NELLIYATT RAGHUNATHAN
AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.
NELLIYATT SOMANATHAN
AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.
NELLIYATT PRASEETHA
AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.
NELLIYATT PREETHA
AGED 51 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.(ALL ARE RESIDING
AT "NELLIYATT HOUSE", KANNOTHUMCHAL CHOVVA, KANNUR TALUK
AND DISTRICT)
BY ADV MATHEW KURIAKOSE
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
KARUNALLICHALIL VASUDEVAN
S/O.KUNHIRAMAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT
"NELLIYATT HOUSE", KANNOTHUMCHAL CHOVVA, KANNUR TALUK AND
DISTRICT.
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH)
GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH
SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN
THIS CRP (LAND REFORMS ACT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Even though this matter was called more than twice today, there was no representation for the petitioners. I, therefore, suspect that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter any further. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…