Kerala High Court

CRP(LR)/90/2018 of NELLIYATT LEELA Vs KARUNALLICHALIL VASUDEVAN on 31 October 2025

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945 CRP(LR) NO. 90 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.01.2011 IN O.A.3/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KUTHUPARAMBA AND THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2017 IN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 26TH ASWINA, 1945

CRP(LR) NO. 90 OF 2018

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.01.2011 IN O.A.3/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE

LAND TRIBUNAL, KUTHUPARAMBA AND THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2017 IN AA

NO.34/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY(LR) KANNUR

REVISION PETITIONERS:

NELLIYATT LEELA

AGED 69 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.

NELLIYATT RAVEENDRAN

AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.

NELLIYARTT MOHANAN

AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.

NELLIYATT DINESHAN

AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.

NELLIYATT SATHI SHYLAJA

AGED 57 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KUNHIMANNI.

NELLIYATT GOMATHI

AGED 64 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA

NELLIYATT RAGHUNATHAN

AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.

NELLIYATT SOMANATHAN

AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.

NELLIYATT PRASEETHA

AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.

NELLIYATT PREETHA

AGED 51 YEARS, D/O.NELLIYATT KAUSALYA.(ALL ARE RESIDING

AT "NELLIYATT HOUSE", KANNOTHUMCHAL CHOVVA, KANNUR TALUK

AND DISTRICT)

BY ADV MATHEW KURIAKOSE

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

KARUNALLICHALIL VASUDEVAN

S/O.KUNHIRAMAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT

"NELLIYATT HOUSE", KANNOTHUMCHAL CHOVVA, KANNUR TALUK AND

DISTRICT.

STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT

SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

BY ADVS.

SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH)

GOVERNMENT PLEADER

SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH

SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN

THIS CRP (LAND REFORMS ACT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

18.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Even though this matter was called more than twice today, there was no representation for the petitioners. I, therefore, suspect that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter any further. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead