Kerala High Court
OP/38885/2002 of GRACY Vs STATE OF KERALA on 25 July 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1945 OP NO. 38926 OF 2002 PETITIONER: P.MARIYAPPAN MOONGALAR PUTHUVAL, MOONGALAR KARA, PERIYAR VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) SRI.K.P.UNNIKRISHNAN
PRESENT
PETITIONER:
P.MARIYAPPAN
MOONGALAR PUTHUVAL,
MOONGALAR KARA,
PERIYAR VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.
SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL)
SRI.K.P.UNNIKRISHNAN
THE STATE OFKERALA
THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THE TAHSILDAR PEERMEDU TALUK
IDUKKI DISTRICT.
PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
HARISONS MALAYALAM LTD.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT BRISTOW ROAD,
WILLINGDON ISLAND, KOCHI – 682 002,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SR.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP SRI UNNIKRISHNAN S
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.07.2023,
ALONG WITH OP.38180/2002, 38885/2002, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
PRESENT
PETITIONER:
AMBROSE, S/O JOSEPH, MOONGALAR
PUDUVAL, MOONGALAR KARA, PERIYAR VILLAGE.
BY ADV SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL)
STATE OF KERALA
THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THE TASILDAR PEERMADE TALUK
IDUKKI DISTRICT.
PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
HARISONS MALAYALAM LTD. REGISTERED
OFFICE AT BRITWO ROAD, WILLINGDON ISLAND,, KOCHI 682003,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR
ALONG WITH OP.38926/2002, 38885/2002 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PRESENT
PETITIONER:
GRACY, MOONGALAR, PUDUVAL,
MOONGALAR KARA,
PERIYAR VILLAGE.
BY ADV SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL)
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
THE TAHSILDAR PEERMADE TALUK
IDUKKI DISTRICT
PEERMAD TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT
PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT
HARRISONS MALAYALAM LTD.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT BRISTOW ROAD,
WILLINGDON, ISLAND, KOCHI-682002,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR
ALONG WITH OP.38926/2002, 38180/2002 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner and counsel remained absent. Advocate Sunitha appeared on behalf of the counsel and she is not ready to argue the matter. All these original petitions are of the year 2002. Now, almost 20 years have elapsed. Hence, the absence of counsel cannot be condoned. All these original petitions will stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-13/07