Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/1998/2023 of SOSAMMA OOMMEN Vs ISHITHA ROY on 16 June 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1998 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13604/2021 DATED 08.12.2022 PETITIONER: SOSAMMA OOMMEN, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O. LATE GEORGE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1998 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13604/2021 DATED 08.12.2022
PETITIONER:
SOSAMMA OOMMEN, AGED 60 YEARS,
W/O. LATE GEORGE THOMAS, ASST. PROFESSOR (RETIRED)
DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, CMS COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM, NO.40
PULIYELI, GREEN VALLEY VILLAS, KALARICKAL LANE, MANGANAM PO, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686018
BY ADVS.
K.C.ELDHO
S.BIJILAL
EBEE ANTONY
ALMAJITHA FATHIMA
RESPONDENTS:
ISHITHA ROY, (FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER) WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695001
SRI.SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE – GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 29.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
COC 1998/23
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
When this matter was called today, Sri.Sunil Kumar Kuriakose – learned Government Pleader, submitted that the order produced along with the memo dated 12.10.2023 is being withdrawn, because the respondent herself has recognised that it is not in compliance with the directions of this Court. He apologized for the inconvenience caused and prayed for another month’s time for a fresh order to be issued. In the afore circumstances, I close this Contempt Case recording the afore submissions of the learned Government Pleader; however, leaving liberty to the petitioner to seek a rehearing if a fresh order in terms of the afore undertaking is not received by her within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
COC 1998/23
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1998/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.13604 OF 2021 DATED 8/12/2022 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 21/12/2022 ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH HER COUNSEL Annexure A3 THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE DESPATCH OF ANNEXURE A1 JUDGMENT ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION DATED 22/12/2022 Annexure A4 A true copy of the order dated 10.10.2023 claiming to be compliance of Annexure A1