Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./5021/2025 of SANEESH KUMAR S Vs STATE OF KERALA on 11 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NO. 5021 OF 2025 1 2025:KER:32098 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 5021 OF 2025 CRIME NO.584/2025 OF Kundara Police Station, Kollam PETITIONER/S: 1 SANEESH KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947

BAIL APPL. NO. 5021 OF 2025

CRIME NO.584/2025 OF Kundara Police Station, Kollam PETITIONER/S:

SANEESH KUMAR S

AGED 33 YEARS

S/O SATHEESHAN PILLAI, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KUZHIYAM, CHANDANATHOPE PO, PERINAD, KOLLAM, PIN - 691014

AMBADI A

AGED 28 YEARS

S/O ANILKUMAR, VARIKOLIL THAZHATHIL, KUZHIYAM, CHANTHANATHOPPU PO, PERINAD, KOLLAM, PIN - 691014

BY ADVS.

SREERAJ M.D.

NEELANJANA NAIR

SAMPATH T.

RESPONDENT/S:

STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF

KERALA, PIN - 682031

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

11.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J

–-------------------------------------

B.A. No.5021 of 2025

--------------------------------------

Dated this the 11th day of April, 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

This Bail application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioners is the accused in Crime No. 584/2025 of Kundara Police Station. The above case is registered alleging offences punishable under Secs. 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2),110 and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

3. The prosecution case is that, on 11.03.2025 at about 23:30 Hrs, the accused 1 to 5 formed an unlawful assembly provoked by the act of the de-facto complainant and his friend named Unni who questioned the accused for smoking beedi, intentionally restrained the de-facto complainant and his friend, and then when the 2nd accused abused them in profane language, the 1st accused caught hold of the de-facto complainant and then and hit the de-facto complainant with an iron bar on his right eye and then the de-facto complainant narrowly escaped from further attack and later when the de- facto complainant’s friend Unni came for rescue, the 3rd accused hit the said Unni at the back of his head with an iron bar and the 2nd accused hit the said Unni in his nose resulting in injury and the remaining accused kicked them both by pushing them to the floor. Thus, the accused were said to have committed the above offences.

4. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application.

5. After hearing both sides, I think this is not a fit case, in which orders u/s. 482 BNSS can be passed. At this stage the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will surrender before the Investigating Officer. The counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioners after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioners. I think that prayer can be allowed.

6. Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioners, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions.

The petitioners will surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today.

If the petitioners surrender before the Investigating Officer as directed above, the Investigating Officer is free to interrogate the petitioners. If arrest is recorded, the petitioners shall be produced before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself.

The petitioners are free to file bail application

before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing them. If such a bail application is filed with advance copy to the prosecutor concerned, the jurisdictional court will consider that bail application in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in it preferably on the date of filing of the same itself.

The Investigating Officer is free to file custody application, if necessary, at the time of producing the petitioners and if such application is filed, the jurisdictional court is free to pass appropriate orders in it also.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

JUDGE SKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead