Kerala High Court
Crl.Rev.Pet/286/2025 of MAHESH M Vs STATE OF KERALA on 11 April 2025
OF 2025 2025:KER:31881 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947 CRL.REV.PET NO. 286 OF 2025 CRIME NO.861/2024 OF THAMPANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE ORDER DATED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947
CRL.REV.PET NO. 286 OF 2025
CRIME NO.861/2024 OF THAMPANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.10.2024 IN CMP NO.5198 OF 2024
OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:
MAHESH M
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O MANIYAN, TC. 76/336, VADAVOOR VEEDU, ANAYARA P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029
BY ADVS.
G.RANJU MOHAN
M.SANTHI (K/868/2011)
PYARIN B. KURUVITHADAM
THEERTHA NAIR A.P.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
BY ADV. SRI.M.P. PRASANTH, PP
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 11.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Thiruvananthapuram in an application under Section 497 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 [Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.)].
2. The learned Public Prosecutor, Sri. M. P. Prasanth has raised an objection that the revision is not maintainable. The learned Public Prosecutor has relied on a decision of the Single Bench of this Court in Yadav Agencies (P) Ltd. v. Philomina [1985 KHC 124] , in which it is held that the revision under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. is not maintainable against an order passed under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in accordance with law. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE BR
APPENDIX OF CRL.REV.PET 286/2025 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN C.M.P.NO.5198/2024 IN CRIME NO.816/2024/2023 DATED 28-10-2024 RESPONDENT’S ANNEXURES: NIL