Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/3143/2024 of HERALD WILSON Vs PROF. DR. K.P. SUDHEER on 11 April 2025
OF 2024 1 2025:KER:31768 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 3143 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.16670 OF 2024 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: HERALD
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3143 OF 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3143 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.16670 OF 2024 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
HERALD WILSON, AGED 55 YEARS
S/O HENTRY, DRIVER, KERALA FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, PEECHI, THRISSUR, PIN
680653, NOW RESIDING AT QUARTERS NO.1/12, KERALA FOREST RESEARCH
INSTITUTE, PEECHI, THRISSUR, PIN - 680653
BY ADVS. R.T.PRADEEP; P.BIJIMON
M.BINDUDAS; NIRANJAN T. PRADEEP
RESPONDENT/S:
PROF. DR. K.P. SUDHEER
AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, EXECUTIVE VICE- PRESIDENT, KERALA STATE COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT, SASTHRABHAVAN, PATTOM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,, PIN - 695004
P.C. SASIDHARAN-SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2025, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3143 OF 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The present contempt case has been filed alleging willful disobedience/non-compliance of the judgment dated 19.08.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.16670/2024.
2. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court on the following terms: “3. It is contended by the petitioner that on the basis of the finding in Ext.P3 as extracted above, the 2nd respondent is bound to extend the benefit of the 11th Pay revision to the petitioner de hors Ext.P5 as there is no requirement for ratification of the decision taken by the Council for his regularisation. Accordingly, in the light of Ext.P3 Judgment, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders in the matter of extending the benefit of 11th Pay Revision to the petitioner in the light of Exts.P3 and P4 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.”
3. The benefit of the 11th pay revision has been extended to the petitioner vide order dated 09.04.2025, in compliance with the judgment CON.CASE(C) NO. 3143 OF 2024
dated 19.08.2024.
Therefore, nothing survives in the Contempt Case, which hereby stands closed.
Sd/- D. K. SINGH JUDGE jjj
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3143 OF 2024
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 3143/2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure I CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 19.8.2024 IN W.P.(C) NO.16670/2024 OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Annexure R1(a) The copy of the order dated 09.04.2025