Kerala High Court

WP(C)/13414/2025 of REJIMON D., Vs SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., on 10 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 13414 OF 2025 PETITIONER: REJIMON D., AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. DIVAKARAN, KUNNEL VELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688538. BY ADVS. P.THOMAS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947

WP(C) NO. 13414 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

REJIMON D.,

AGED 53 YEARS,

S/O. DIVAKARAN, KUNNEL VELI, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688538.

BY ADVS.

P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE

TONY THOMAS (INCHIPARAMBIL)

SAGAR ROSHAN

RUBAN JOE TONIYO

ARUN PAUL JACOB

RESPONDENTS:

SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,

REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MANNANCHERRY ALIAS, MUHAMMA BRANCH, ALEPPEY DISTRICT, PIN – 690502.

AUTHORISED OFFICER,

SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., MANNANCHERRY ALIAS, MUHAMMA

BRANCH, ALEPPEY DISTRICT, PIN – 690502.

BY ADVS.

JOHN PRAKASH B J, SC

P.PRAMEL(K/351/2009)

SOORAJ M.S.(K/717/2023)

VARSHA VIJAYAKUMAR NAIR(K/003412/2023)

MANU BABY(K/003827/2024)

RAJASREE K.(K/000400/2025)

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings under the SARFAESI Act which have been initiated by the respondent Bank for recovery of the amounts due from the petitioner.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan accounts.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent Bank that the petitioner committed default in repayment of a housing loan and a term loan the total overdue amount as on today (10.04.2025) is Rs.6,72,000/-(Rupees six lakhs seventy two thousand only). It is further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent Bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan accounts.

4. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the total overdue amount on condition that Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) shall be paid on or before 30.04.2025 and the balance amount along with any accrued interest, costs and charges shall be paid in six equal monthly instalments, the first of which shall be paid on or before 30.05.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the last working day of every succeeding months and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan accounts regularised.

5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent Bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.6,72,000/-(Rupees six lakhs seventy two thousand only) along with any accrued interest, costs and charges from the petitioner and regularise the loan accounts of the petitioner in the following manner:- i. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) on or before 30.04.2025. The balance overdue amount along with any accrued interest, costs and charges shall be paid in six equal monthly instalments;

ii. The first instalment shall be paid on or before 30.05.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the last working day of every succeeding month; iii.Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI’s / instalments along with the instalments directed above;

iv. In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent Bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;

v. In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13414/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP 3457/2024 IN MC NO. 494/24 DATED.24.8.2024 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALAPPUZHA Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED.25.3.2025

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead