Kerala High Court

Crl.MC/3422/2025 of VAISHNAV VALSAN Vs STATE OF KERALA on 10 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 3422 OF 2025 CRIME NO.780/2023 OF VELLATHOOVAL POLICE STATION, IDUKKI IN SC NO.102 OF 2024 OF FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT, DEVIKULAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947

CRL.MC NO. 3422 OF 2025

CRIME NO.780/2023 OF VELLATHOOVAL POLICE STATION, IDUKKI

IN SC NO.102 OF 2024 OF FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT, DEVIKULAM

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

VAISHNAV VALSAN

AGED 24 YEARS

S/O VALSAN, KILIKOD HOUSE, CHALINGAD KARA, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680681

BY ADVS.

LAL K.JOSEPH

P.MURALEEDHARAN (THURAVOOR)

T.A.LUXY

SURESH SUKUMAR

ANZIL SALIM

SANJAY SELLEN

SONIA SHIBU

AKASH GEORGE

ADITHYA S. PUTHEZHATH

RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

VELLATHOOVAL POLICE STATION, VELLATHOOVAL - ANACHAL

ROAD, VELLATHOOVAL, KERALA, PIN - 685563

BY ADV.SRI. E.C. BINEESH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------

Crl.M.C.No.3422 of 2025

------------------------------------

Dated, this the 10th day of April, 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by condition no.(i) in Annexure-A1 bail Order, which directs the petitioner to report before the Investigating Officer on every alternate Saturday until conclusion of the trial in the subject crime.

3. Learned Counsel would point that the final report has already been filed and condition no.(i) was scrupulously followed by the petitioner, without fail. It was also argued that the petitioner needs to travel a distance of about 217 kms to report before the Police Station concerned. According to the learned Counsel, there is no necessity, whatsoever, to continue the said condition which warrants reporting before the S.H.O., inasmuch as the final report has already been filed.

4. This application was seriously opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor, especially in the context of the seriousness of the offences alleged.

5. This Court finds considerable force in the submissions made by the Counsel for the petitioner. It is important to note that the final report has already been filed and the presence of the petitioner is not required for any purpose in connection with the investigation. If that be so, an onerous condition directing the petitioner to report before the Investigating Officer until the culmination of trial, seems to be unnecessary. The purpose of reporting before the S.H.O. has already been served. In the circumstances, condition no.(i) is dispensed with, with the result, the petitioner will not be under any obligation to report before the S.H.O., except when the petitioner is specifically called by the S.H.O. in writing, to report so. The Crl.M.C. is allowed as indicated above. Sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN SKP/10-04 JUDGE

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3422/2025 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.07.2024 IN BAIL APPL. NO. 5426 OF 2024 OF THIS HON’BLE COURT ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION NUMBERED AS CRL. M.P. 59 OF 2025 IN S.C. 102 OF 2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.01.2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT, DEVIKULAM ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON’BLE FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT, DEVIKULAM DATED 06.02.2025 RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead